International Journal of


EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12

line decor
line decor

 Volume 8, Issue 1 (January 2021), Pages: 117-124


 Original Research Paper

 Title: Evaluation of the impact of motivation to work on the performance of lecturers using exploratory factor analysis and multi-linear regression model

 Author(s): Bui Van Huyen 1, Ta Van Loi 2, Do Anh Duc 2, *, Le Anh Duc 3


 1Institute of Economics, Ho Chi Minh National Academy of Politics, Hanoi, Vietnam
 2School of Trade and International Economics, National Economics University, Hanoi, Vietnam
 3Faculty of Mathematical Economics, National Economics University, Hanoi, Vietnam

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile:

 Digital Object Identifier:


Motivation and performance are crucial factors regarding university success and students’ achievements. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of motivation to work on the performance of lecturers using exploratory factor analysis and multi-linear regression. Questionnaires were used to collect data from respondents. The data were analyzed by frequencies, percentages, means, Pearson’ Linear Correlation Coefficient, exploratory factor analysis, and multi-linear regression model based on the survey data of 321 university lecturers at Vietnam National University, Hanoi. The research results show four factors that positively affect the performance of lecturers, including wages and other benefits, training and development, working environment, and working motivation. As a result, the study is the basis for making appropriate policies that contribute to enhance the motivation and performance of the lecturers. 

 © 2020 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (

 Keywords: Motivation to work, Performance of lecturers, Multi-linear regression model

 Article History: Received 5 July 2020, Received in revised form 4 September 2020, Accepted 7 September 2020


No Acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.


  Bui VH, Ta VL, and Do AD et al. (2021). Evaluation of the impact of motivation to work on the performance of lecturers using exploratory factor analysis and multi-linear regression model. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 8(1): 117-124

 Permanent Link to this page


 Fig. 1


 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 Table 8 Table 9 Table 10 Table 11 Table 12 Table 13 Table 14 Table 15 


 References (26)

  1. Ai TH, My TPT, and Chieu MPT (2019). Work motivation of lecturers in non-public universities: The case of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The EUrASEANs: Journal on Global Socio-Economic Dynamics, 4(17): 46-58.   [Google Scholar]
  2. Davidson E (2007). The pivotal role of teacher motivation in Tanzanian education. The Educational Forum, 71(2): 157-166.   [Google Scholar]
  3. Dinham S and Scott C (1997). Modelling teacher satisfaction: Findings from 892 teaching staff at 71 schools. In the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  4. Dinham S and Scott C (2000). Moving into the third, outer domain of teacher satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(4): 379-396.   [Google Scholar]
  5. Do AD and Canh CC (2018). Designing standards for lecturers at research based universities in Vietnam. Journal of Economics and Development, 252(2): 20-32.   [Google Scholar]
  6. Ghozali I (2017). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 23 [Multivariate analysis application with the IBM SPSS 23 program]. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia.   [Google Scholar]
  7. Gundry LK (2007). Managing creativity and innovation in the 21st century. In: Wankel C (Ed.), 21st century management: A reference handbook: 450-460. SAGE Publication, London, UK.   [Google Scholar]
  8. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, and Tatham RL (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  9. Herzberg F, Mausner B, and Snyderman BB (1959). The motivation to work. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  10. Leonard NH, Beauvais LL, and Scholl RW (1999). Work motivation: The incorporation of self-concept-based processes. Human Relations, 52(8): 969-998.   [Google Scholar]
  11. Maslow AH (1989). A theory of human motivation. Readings in Managerial Psychology, 20: 20-35.   [Google Scholar]
  12. McGregor D and Cutcher-Gershenfeld J (1960). The human side of enterprise. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  13. Mitchell TR (1982). Motivation: New directions for theory, research, and practice. Academy of Management Review, 7(1): 80-88.   [Google Scholar]
  14. Nadeem M, Ahmad N, Abdullah M, and Hamad N (2014). Impact of employee motivation on employee performance (A case study of Private firms: Multan District, Pakistan). International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 36: 51-58.   [Google Scholar]
  15. Nadeem M, Rana MS, Lone AH, Maqbool S, Naz K, and Akhtar A (2011). Teacher's competencies and factors affecting the performance of female teachers in Bahawalpur (Southern Punjab) Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(19): 217-222.   [Google Scholar]
  16. Narasuci W, Setiawan M, and Noermijati N (2018). Effect of work environment on lecturer performance mediated by work motivation and job satisfaction. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 16(4): 645-653.   [Google Scholar]
  17. Negussie Y and Ranjan M (2014). Motivational factors that affect teachers’ work performance in secondary schools of Jijiga City, Somali Regional State, Ethiopia. Ph.D. Dissertation, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.   [Google Scholar]
  18. Pinder CC (2014). Work motivation in organizational behavior. Psychology Press, London, UK.   [Google Scholar]
  19. Rasheed MI, Humayon AA, Awan U, and Ahmed AUD (2016). Factors affecting teachers’ motivation. International Journal of Educational Management, 30: 101-114.   [Google Scholar]
  20. Sampson JP, Driscoll MP, Foulk DF, and Carroll PS (2010). Successful faculty performance in teaching, research and original creative work, and service. Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  21. Seebaluck AK and Seegum TD (2013). Motivation among public primary school teachers in Mauritius. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(4): 446-464.   [Google Scholar]
  22. Shah MJ, Akhtar G, Zafar H, and Riaz A (2012). Job satisfaction and motivation of teachers of public educational institutions. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(8): 271-281.   [Google Scholar]
  23. Shahzadi I, Javed A, Pirzada SS, Nasreen S, and Khanam F (2014). Impact of employee motivation on employee performance. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(23): 159-166.   [Google Scholar]
  24. Steers RM and Porter LW (1983). Motivation and work behavior. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  25. Tabachnick BG and Fidell LS (1996). Using multivariate statistics. 3rd Edition, Harper Collins, New York, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  26. Tella A, Ayeni CO, and Popoola SO (2007). Work motivation, job satisfaction, and organisational commitment of library personnel in academic and research libraries in Oyo State, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice, 9(2): 1-16.   [Google Scholar]