International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12

line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 13, Issue 9 (September 2026), Pages: 252-262

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

Development of the corporate bond market in Vietnam: Policy recommendations

 Author(s): 

Bui Quoc Dung 1, Le The Sau 2, Vu Mai Chi 3, *

 Affiliation(s):

1State Audit Office of Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam
2Specialised Audit Department No. VII, State Audit Office of Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam
3Banking Faculty, Banking Academy of Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam

 Full text

    Full Text - PDF

 * Corresponding Author. 

   Corresponding author's ORCID profile:  https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2374-2027

 Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

 
https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2026.09.023

 Abstract

This study examines the determinants of corporate bond market development in Vietnam and provides policy recommendations to improve market sustainability. Based on survey data from 176 market participants, the study evaluates five groups of factors: legal framework and market supervision, market infrastructure and pricing mechanisms, investor structure and financial intermediaries, issuance procedures and costs, and disclosure and transparency. Cronbach’s alpha is used to test the reliability of the scales, while Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) is applied to validate the measurement model. Subsequently, multiple linear regression is employed to test the proposed hypotheses. The findings indicate that market infrastructure and pricing mechanisms, together with investor structure and financial intermediaries, have positive and significant effects on corporate bond market development. Issuance procedures and costs have a marginally significant positive effect, while the legal framework and market supervision, and disclosure and transparency, do not show clear direct effects. The study suggests improving market infrastructure, developing institutional investors, reforming the issuance process, and strengthening the legal framework and disclosure requirements in the long term.

 © 2026 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords

Corporate bond market, Market development, Market infrastructure, Investor structure, Issuance procedures

 Article history

Received 13 April 2026, Received in revised form 2 September 2026, Accepted 6 October 2026

 Acknowledgment

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Banking Academy of Vietnam. 

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Ethical considerations 

Participation was voluntary, informed consent was obtained, and responses were collected anonymously. 

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

Dung BQ, Sau LT, and Chi VM (2026). Development of the corporate bond market in Vietnam: Policy recommendations. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 13(9): 252-262

  Permanent Link to this page

---------------------------------------------- 

 References (16)

  1. Adusei M and Adeleye N (2021). Corporate disclosure and credit market development. Journal of Applied Economics, 24(1): 205-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2021.1901644   [Google Scholar]
  2. Ayala D, Nedeljkovic M, and Saborowski C (2017). What slice of the pie? The corporate bond market boom in emerging economies. Journal of Financial Stability, 30: 16-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2017.03.003   [Google Scholar]
  3. Begum NN and Kamal MA (2018). Exploring the key factors affecting development of bond market in Bangladesh: An application of exploratory factor analysis (EFA). International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8(5): 266–275.   [Google Scholar]
  4. Bessembinder H and Maxwell W (2008). Markets: Transparency and the corporate bond market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2): 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.2.217   [Google Scholar]
  5. Bessembinder H, Maxwell W, and Venkataraman K (2006). Market transparency, liquidity externalities, and institutional trading costs in corporate bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 82(2): 251-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.10.002   [Google Scholar]
  6. Cavallo EA and Valenzuela P (2010). The determinants of corporate risk in emerging markets: An option‐adjusted spread analysis. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 15(1): 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.398   [Google Scholar]
  7. Edwards AK, Harris LE, and Piwowar MS (2007). Corporate bond market transaction costs and transparency. The Journal of Finance, 62(3): 1421-1451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01240.x   [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldstein MA, Hotchkiss ES, and Sirri ER (2007). Transparency and liquidity: A controlled experiment on corporate bonds. The Review of Financial Studies, 20(2): 235-273. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhl020   [Google Scholar]
  9. Gu X and Kowalewski O (2016). Creditor rights and the corporate bond market. Journal of International Money and Finance, 67: 215-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2016.05.002   [Google Scholar]
  10. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, and Anderson RE (2013). Multivariate data analysis. 7th Edition, Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, UK.   [Google Scholar]
  11. Jahur MS and Quadir N (2010). Development of bond market in Bangladesh: Issues, status, and policies. Management Research and Practice, 2(3): 299-313.   [Google Scholar]
  12. Kline RB (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th Edition, The Guilford Press, New York, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  13. Li D, Magud NE, and Werner A (2023). The long-run impact of sovereign yields on corporate yields in emerging markets. Journal of International Money and Finance, 130: 102748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102748   [Google Scholar]
  14. Moretti M, Pandolfi L, Villegas-Bauer G, Schmukler SL, and Williams T (2024). Inelastic demand meets optimal supply of risky sovereign bonds. IMF Working Paper No. 2024/227, International Monetary Fund, Washington, USA. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-10735   [Google Scholar]
  15. OECD (2024). Development co-operation report 2024: Tackling poverty and inequalities through the green transition. OECD Publishing, Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1787/357b63f7-en   [Google Scholar]
  16. Smaoui H, Grandes M, and Akindele A (2017). The determinants of bond market development: Further evidence from emerging and developed countries. Emerging Markets Review, 32: 148-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2017.06.003   [Google Scholar]