International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12

line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 13, Issue 5 (May 2026), Pages: 206-215

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

Psychological counseling services for persons with disabilities in rehabilitation centers: Evidence from social work practice in Vietnam

 Author(s): 

M. A. Do Thi Kim Hue, Nguyen Trung Hai *

 Affiliation(s):

Social Work Faculty, University of Labor and Social Affairs, Hanoi, Vietnam

 Full text

    Full Text - PDF

 * Corresponding Author. 

   Corresponding author's ORCID profile:  https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2831-2616

 Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

 
https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2026.05.019

 Abstract

Psychological counseling is an important component of social work services in residential rehabilitation centers for persons with disabilities (PWDs). However, limited evidence is available on counseling practices, perceived effectiveness, and professional competence in low- and middle-income countries, including Vietnam. This mixed-methods study was conducted at a public residential rehabilitation center in Vietnam. Quantitative data were collected through a structured survey of 148 PWDs selected from the center’s disability management records and assessed for their ability to participate. Analyses related to psychological counseling focused on 58 PWDs who had directly received counseling services. Qualitative data were obtained through non-participant observation and semi-structured interviews with PWDs and caregivers (n = 6), social workers (n = 4), and center leaders (n = 2). Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. The results showed that stress-relief counseling and supportive conversations were the most common counseling activities. Individual face-to-face counseling was the most widely used and was considered the most effective approach, while group and telephone counseling were less common and showed more varied effectiveness ratings. Social workers received generally positive evaluations, especially regarding ethics and attitudes, although differences were observed in counseling methods and practical skills. The findings emphasize the need for continuous professional development and interdisciplinary collaboration.

 © 2026 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords

Psychological counseling, Residential rehabilitation, Persons with disabilities, Social work services, Vietnam

 Article history

Received 16 January 2026, Received in revised form 7 May 2026, Accepted 21 May 2026

 Acknowledgment

This research was supported by the University of Labor and Social Affairs under the institutional research funding program. The authors sincerely thank all students and participants who contributed to this study

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Ethical considerations

The study adhered to ethical principles of social research, including voluntary participation, informed consent, confidentiality, and respect for participants’ dignity. All participants were informed about the purpose of the study and their right to withdraw at any time without consequences. Identifying information was removed from transcripts and datasets, and all data were used solely for academic research purposes

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

Hue MADTK and Trung Hai N (2026). Psychological counseling services for persons with disabilities in rehabilitation centers: Evidence from social work practice in Vietnam. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 13(5): 206-215

  Permanent Link to this page

---------------------------------------------- 

 References (19)

  1. Bourne J, Harrison TL, Wigham S, Morison CJ, and Hackett S (2022). A systematic review of community psychosocial group interventions for adults with intellectual disabilities and mental health conditions. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 35(1): 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12919   [Google Scholar] PMid:34337837
  2. Bowen GA (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2): 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027   [Google Scholar]
  3. Braun V and Clarke V (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa   [Google Scholar]
  4. Buckingham S, Anil K, Demain S, Gunn H, Jones RB, Kent B, Logan A, Marsden J, Playford ED, and Freeman J (2023). Telerehabilitation for people with physical disabilities and movement impairment: Development and evaluation of an online toolkit for practitioners and patients. Disability and Rehabilitation, 45(11): 1885-1892. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2074549   [Google Scholar] PMid:35603803
  5. Bulkes NZ, Davis K, Kay B, and Riemann BC (2022). Comparing efficacy of telehealth to in-person mental health care in intensive-treatment-seeking adults. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 145: 347-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.11.003   [Google Scholar] PMid:34799124 PMCid:PMC8595951
  6. Corey G (2017). Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy. 10th Edition, Cengage Learning, Boston, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  7. Corrigan PW, Morris SB, Michaels PJ, Rafacz JD, and Rüsch N (2012). Challenging the public stigma of mental illness: A meta-analysis of outcome studies. Psychiatric Services, 63(10): 963-973. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201100529   [Google Scholar] PMid:23032675
  8. Creswell JW and Clark VLP (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd Edition, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  9. Emerson E, Hatton C, Baines S, and Robertson J (2016). The physical health of British adults with intellectual disability: Cross sectional study. International Journal for Equity in Health, 15: 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0296-x   [Google Scholar] PMid:26791808 PMCid:PMC4719222
  10. Flückiger C, Del Re AC, Wampold BE, and Horvath AO (2018). The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy, 55(4): 316–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000172   [Google Scholar] PMid:29792475
  11. Gustafsson C, Öjehagen A, Hansson L, Sandlund M, Nyström M, Glad J, Cruce G, Jonsson AK, and Fredriksson M (2009). Effects of psychosocial interventions for people with intellectual disabilities and mental health problems: A survey of systematic reviews. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(3): 281-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731508329403   [Google Scholar]
  12. Healy K (2014). Social work theories in context: Creating frameworks for practice. 2nd Edition, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-02425-1_11   [Google Scholar] PMid:28118817
  13. Hobfoll SE, Watson P, Bell CC et al. (2021). Five essential elements of immediate and mid–term mass trauma intervention: Empirical evidence. Psychiatry, 84(4): 311-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2021.2005387   [Google Scholar] PMid:35061969
  14. Ko M, Azzopardi M, Loizou C, Logeswaran A, Ng B, Pacho A, and Chong YJ (2025). Telehealth and people with disabilities in the United Kingdom: A scoping review. Frontiers in Public Health, 13: 1504318. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1504318   [Google Scholar] PMid:40013026 PMCid:PMC11860869
  15. Shakespeare T, Bright T, and Kuper H (2018). Access to health for persons with disabilities. United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva, Switzerland.   [Google Scholar]
  16. Stubbe DE (2018). The therapeutic alliance: The fundamental element of psychotherapy. Focus, 16(4): 402-403. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.20180022   [Google Scholar] PMid:31975934 PMCid:PMC6493237
  17. Wampold BE (2015). How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry, 14(3): 270-277. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20238   [Google Scholar] PMid:26407772 PMCid:PMC4592639
  18. WHO (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.   [Google Scholar]
  19. WHO (2011). World report on disability. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.   [Google Scholar]