|
Volume 13, Issue 5 (May 2026), Pages: 43-51
----------------------------------------------
Original Research Paper
Understanding student coping with school violence: A comparative study of primary and secondary education in Vietnam
Author(s):
Hanh Thi Hoang, Hien Thu Le *, Thuy Thi Thanh Le
Affiliation(s):
Social Work Department, Vietnam Youth Academy, Hanoi, Vietnam
Full text
Full Text - PDF
* Corresponding Author.
Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7873-9962
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2026.05.005
Abstract
This study examined how primary and secondary school students in Vietnam respond to witnessing or experiencing school violence, with a focus on developmental differences. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 690 students (300 primary and 390 secondary) from Bac Kan, An Giang, and Quang Binh provinces. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire with a 4-point Likert scale and analyzed using descriptive statistics in SPSS. The findings showed that primary school students tended to use more passive strategies; although most reported not remaining idle (70.3%) or walking away (66.6%), only 33.5% reported incidents to teachers. Among victims, most stated they did not cry or plead (92.6%) and did not suffer in silence (81.1%). In contrast, secondary school students demonstrated more proactive responses: 54.4% often tried to prevent violence, 66.2% informed a teacher or adult, and 61.8% sought help from a homeroom teacher or Youth Union leader, although use of formal support services remained limited (49.5%). Overall, clear developmental differences were identified, with primary students relying more on passive strategies and secondary students engaging more in help-seeking and preventive actions, highlighting the need for age-appropriate and culturally sensitive interventions.
© 2026 The Authors. Published by IASE.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords
School violence, Coping behaviors, Primary and secondary students, Help-seeking behavior, Vietnam
Article history
Received 3 December 2025, Received in revised form 15 April 2026, Accepted 4 May 2026
Funding
The study was supported and approved by the Scientific Committee of the Youth Research Institute (Code: ĐT.KXĐTN 25-07).
Acknowledgment
No Acknowledgment.
Compliance with ethical standards
Ethical considerations
Although the participating institutions do not maintain a formal institutional review board, all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. Participation was strictly voluntary, informed consent was obtained from all respondents and/or their guardians, and no personally identifiable information was collected at any stage of the research.
Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Citation:
Hoang HT, Le HT, and Le TTT (2026). Understanding student coping with school violence: A comparative study of primary and secondary education in Vietnam. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 13(5): 43-51
Permanent Link to this page
----------------------------------------------
References (18)- Chiang S, Chin CA, Meyer EW, Sust S, and Chu J (2022). Asian American adolescent help-seeking pathways for psychological distress. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 13(2): 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000241 [Google Scholar]
- Coker AL and Clear ER (2014). New approaches to violence prevention through bystander intervention. In: Johnson H, Fisher B, and Jaquier V (Eds.), Critical issues on violence against women: 221-232. 1st Edition, Routledge, London, UK. [Google Scholar]
- Gaffney H, Ttofi MM, and Farrington DP (2021). Effectiveness of school‐based programs to reduce bullying perpetration and victimization: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(2): e1143. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1143 [Google Scholar] PMid:37131921 PMCid:PMC8356322
- Greco AM and Segura A (2025). Measuring and addressing childhood and youth victimization from the school context. In: Cortes-Perez OI (Ed.), Ecologies of violence: A comparative perspective in contemporary victimology and criminology: 173–199. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-91957-2_10 [Google Scholar]
- Halliday S, Gregory T, Taylor A, Digenis C, and Turnbull D (2021). The impact of bullying victimization in early adolescence on subsequent psychosocial and academic outcomes across the adolescent period: A systematic review. Journal of School Violence, 20(3): 351-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2021.1913598 [Google Scholar]
- Han ZY, Ye ZY, and Zhong BL (2025). School bullying and mental health among adolescents: A narrative review. Translational Pediatrics, 14(3): 463-472. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-2024-512 [Google Scholar] PMid:40225076 PMCid:PMC11982999
- Hollarek M and Lee NC (2022). Current understanding of developmental changes in adolescent perspective taking. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45: 101308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101308 [Google Scholar] PMid:35287012
- Knoester M, Robinson MG, and Somé TH (2025). Fostering school–family relationships in multicultural communities. Teachers College Press, New York, USA. [Google Scholar]
- Kutsyuruba B, Klinger DA, and Hussain A (2015). Relationships among school climate, school safety, and student achievement and well‐being: A review of the literature. Review of Education, 3(2): 103-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3043 [Google Scholar]
- Matthys W and Schutter DJ (2022). Improving our understanding of impaired social problem-solving in children and adolescents with conduct problems: Implications for cognitive behavioral therapy. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 25: 552-572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-021-00376-y [Google Scholar] PMid:35165840
- Matthys W and Schutter DJ (2023). Moral thinking and empathy in cognitive behavioral therapy for children and adolescents with conduct problems: A narrative review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 26: 401-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-023-00429-4 [Google Scholar] PMid:36905479 PMCid:PMC10123041
- Mooij T (2005). National campaign effects on secondary pupils' bullying and violence. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3): 489-511. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X23727 [Google Scholar] PMid:16238878
- Nguyen DT, Dedding C, Pham TT, and Bunders J (2013). Perspectives of pupils, parents, and teachers on mental health problems among Vietnamese secondary school pupils. BMC Public Health, 13: 1046. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1046 [Google Scholar] PMid:24192066 PMCid:PMC3870964
- Nguyen-Thi HP, Truong AN, Le VT, Nguyen XTK, and Tran-Chi VL (2024). The relationship between academic performance, peer pressure, and educational stress as it relates to high school students’ openness to seeking professional psychological help. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 13(1): 83-101. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v13n1p83 [Google Scholar]
- Noddings N and Brooks L (2017). Teaching controversial issues: The case for critical thinking and moral commitment in the classroom. Teachers College Press, New York, USA. [Google Scholar]
- Piaget J (2013). The moral judgment of the child. Routledge, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315009681 [Google Scholar]
- Tian X, Huebner ES, and Tian L (2025). Defending behavior in bullying and defenders’ psychosocial outcomes among children and adolescents: A series of three-level meta-analyses. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 54: 1615-1645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02176-x [Google Scholar] PMid:40175833
- Wang J, Iannotti RJ, and Nansel TR (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: Physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(4): 368-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021 [Google Scholar] PMid:19766941 PMCid:PMC2751860
|