Volume 13, Issue 2 (February 2026), Pages: 240-245

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

Development and evaluation of a contextualized self-learning module in disaster readiness and risk reduction

 Author(s): 

Gracie Ann M. Dy *

 Affiliation(s):

Laboratory High School Department, Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology, Cabanatuan, Philippines

 Full text

    Full Text - PDF

 * Corresponding Author. 

   Corresponding author's ORCID profile:  https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2851-3530

 Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2026.02.025

 Abstract

Developing effective learning modules requires substantial effort from teachers to improve students’ understanding. This study aimed to develop a contextualized self-learning module (SLM) in Disaster Readiness and Risk Reduction (DRRR) for Grade 11 STEM and GAS students. The module was designed to support independent learning, enhance higher-order thinking skills, and connect lessons to real-life situations, particularly disasters experienced in the country. The researcher, a DRRR teacher, developed the module in alignment with the Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCs) and followed the standard SLM format prescribed by the Department of Education. The development was based on the premise that contextualized self-learning promotes meaningful learning by linking new concepts to students’ lived experiences and the nation’s disaster history. The SLM includes structured sections such as learning objectives, prior knowledge assessment, content discussion, enrichment activities, assessment tasks, and an answer key. Evaluation results showed that teachers rated the module highest in the statement of learning objectives (WM = 3.69) and lowest in provision for evaluation (WM = 3.59), both interpreted as very satisfactory. Similarly, experts gave the highest rating to the statement of learning objectives (WM = 3.82) and the lowest to adherence to current situations and health protocols (WM = 3.55), which were also interpreted as very satisfactory. Overall, the findings indicate that the developed contextualized SLM met acceptable quality standards for instructional materials. Feedback and recommendations from teachers and experts were incorporated to further improve the module’s relevance, effectiveness, and academic value.

 © 2026 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords

Contextualized learning, Self-learning module, Disaster readiness, Independent learning, Instructional quality

 Article history

Received 24 August 2025, Received in revised form 12 January 2026, Accepted 22 February 2026

 Acknowledgment

The author would like to express heartfelt gratitude to the Deans and Professors of the Graduate School Department of Phinma Araullo University and Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology for their invaluable support throughout the course of this work. Sincere appreciation is also extended to her former institution, Sto Domingo National Trade School, where she proudly served as a science teacher for 10 years. Their encouragement and influence have played a significant role in shaping her professional journey. 

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Ethical considerations:

Permission to conduct the study was obtained from the Schools Division Superintendent of the Schools Division of Nueva Ecija, with the endorsement of the Thesis Adviser and the Dean of the Graduate School. Participation was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all respondents prior to data collection. The identities of participants were kept anonymous, and all data were treated with confidentiality and used solely for research purposes. Data collection was conducted in accordance with the health and safety protocols stipulated in DepEd Memorandum No. 034, s. 2020. 

 Citation:

Dy GAM (2026). Development and evaluation of a contextualized self-learning module in disaster readiness and risk reduction. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 13(2): 240-245

  Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

  Fig. 1

 Tables

  Table 1 Table 2

---------------------------------------------- 

 References (11)

1. de Jong T (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38: 105-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0   [Google Scholar]

2. Dio RV and Madrazo AL (2020). Contextualized learning modules in bridging students' learning gaps in calculus with analytic geometry through independent learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3): 457–476. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.12456.457-476   [Google Scholar]

3. Ganiron TU (2015). Development and validation of module presentation of selected topics in physics for architecture students. In the Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference of the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), Orléans, France: 1-9.   [Google Scholar]

4. Garin RM, Reyes R, Domantay GF, and Rosals J (2017). Contextualized and localized teaching as a technique in teaching basic statistics. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 4(1): 62-67.   [Google Scholar]

5. Gedera DSP (2022). Quality standards in designing online courses. In: Peters MA (Ed.), Encyclopedia of teacher education: 1511-1517. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8679-5_62   [Google Scholar]

6. Jou YT, Mariñas KA, and Saflor CS (2022). Assessing cognitive factors of modular distance learning of K-12 students amidst the COVID-19 pandemic towards academic achievements and satisfaction. Behavioral Sciences, 12(7): 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12070200   [Google Scholar] PMid:35877270 PMCid:PMC9312230

7. Moradi M, Liu L, Luchies C, Patterson MM, and Darban B (2018). Enhancing teaching-learning effectiveness by creating online interactive instructional modules for fundamental concepts of physics and mathematics. Education Sciences, 8(3): 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030109   [Google Scholar]

8. Osman K and Lee TT (2014). Impact of interactive multimedia module with pedagogical agents on students’ understanding and motivation in the learning of electrochemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12: 395-421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9407-y   [Google Scholar]

9. Reyes J, Insorio AO, Ingreso MLV, Hilario FF, and Gutierrez CR (2019). Conception and application of contextualization in mathematics education. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 6(1): 1-18.   [Google Scholar]

10. Tomlinson B and Masuhara H (2004). Developing language course materials. RELC Portfolio Series, Singapore.   [Google Scholar]

11. Torrefranca EC (2017). Development and validation of instructional modules on rational expressions and variations. The Normal Lights, 11(1): 43-73. https://doi.org/10.56278/tnl.v11i1.375   [Google Scholar]