International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 11, Issue 1 (January 2024), Pages: 32-39

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

Determinants of the millennial generation's intention to use Sharia home mortgages

 Author(s): 

 Nur Rizqi Febriandika 1, *, Muhammad Sanusi 2, Yana Al Yanafi 1, Dilla Gading Kusuma 1

 Affiliation(s):

 1Islamic Economic Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia
 2Islamic Bank, STEI HAMZAR Lombok Timur, Lombok Timur, Indonesia

 Full text

  Full Text - PDF

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9063-6990

 Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.01.004

 Abstract

A survey conducted by rumah.com showed that a notable number of participants, specifically 37 percent of those aged 22-29 and 36 percent of those aged 30-39, prefer Sharia mortgages to traditional ones. This research aims to explore the willingness of millennials to opt for Islamic housing loans, focusing on how their religious devotion influences this decision. The methodology of this study is quantitative, involving the distribution of questionnaires to 202 millennials. The gathered data underwent analysis using structural equation modeling (SEM-21) and SPSS 25. Findings from the study reveal that both the cost and the individual's earnings significantly encourage millennials to consider Islamic home loans, whereas their level of religious commitment does not play a crucial role. The study concludes that many millennials are inclined towards Sharia mortgages due to the fixed and extended period of repayments. Given their steady income, millennials find purchasing a home more appealing than renting, as owning a home offers a tangible asset that represents savings from their earnings.

 © 2023 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords

 Millennials, House ownership, Credit, Sharia mortgages, Intention

 Article history

 Received 14 August 2023, Received in revised form 18 December 2023, Accepted 19 December 2023

 Acknowledgment 

No Acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

 Febriandika NR, Sanusi M, Al Yanafi Y, and Kusuma DG (2024). Determinants of the millennial generation's intention to use Sharia home mortgages. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 11(1): 32-39

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 

 Tables

 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 

----------------------------------------------   

 References (46)

  1. Adiyanto MR, Sumarwan U, and Saptono IT (2017). Consumer behavior analysis in choosing conventional or Sharia mortgage product in Indonesia. Asian Social Science, 13(8): 74-90. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n8p74   [Google Scholar]
  2. Al Qorni GFW and Juliana J (2020). Sharia property purchase decision without bank: Analysis of the influence of price factors environment and religiosity. Jurnal Ekonomika dan Bisnis Islam, 3(3): 234-245. https://doi.org/10.26740/jekobi.v3n3.p234-245   [Google Scholar]
  3. Alam A, Mirza LAW, and Mu’awanah C (2021). Description analysis of Muslim millennial trust and comfort in using crowdfunding platforms for donation. In the 1st International Conference on Economics, Management, and Accounting, Sukabumi, Indonesia: 119-128.   [Google Scholar]
  4. Ali M, Raza SA, Puah CH, and Karim MZA (2017). Islamic home financing in Pakistan: A SEM-based approach using modified TPB model. Housing Studies, 32(8): 1156-1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2017.1302079   [Google Scholar]
  5. Amin H (2017a). Consumer behaviour of Islamic home financing: Investigating its determinants from the theory of Islamic consumer behaviour. Humanomics, 33(4): 517-548. https://doi.org/10.1108/H-12-2016-0102   [Google Scholar]
  6. Amin H (2017b). Explaining the decision to choose Islamic mortgage financing: The case of East Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Society, 18(S1): 177-192.   [Google Scholar]
  7. Amin H (2019). The Islamic theory of consumer behaviour for ijarah home financing. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 13(4): 672-693. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-09-2018-0261   [Google Scholar]
  8. Amin H, Abdul-Rahman AR, and Abdul-Razak D (2013). An integrative approach for understanding Islamic home financing adoption in Malaysia. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 31(7): 544-573. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-02-2013-0008   [Google Scholar]
  9. Anastasia N, Thiosalim LP, and Malelak MI (2021). Determinants of intention of using mortgage in financing home ownership in Surabaya. Asia Pacific Management and Business Application, 10(1): 55-68. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.apmba.2021.010.01.4   [Google Scholar]
  10. Athief FHN and Ma’ruf A (2023). Tracing the asymmetry of religiosity-based loyalty of Islamic bank depositors. Banks and Bank Systems, 18(1): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.18(1).2023.01   [Google Scholar]
  11. Bucks B and Pence K (2006). Do homeowners know their house values and mortgage terms? Working paper, Federal Reserve Board of Governors, Washington, USA. https://doi.org/10.17016/feds.2006.03   [Google Scholar]
  12. Considine D, Horton J, and Moorman G (2009). Teaching and reaching the millennial generation through media literacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 52(6): 471-481. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.6.2   [Google Scholar]
  13. Dawami Q (2020). Factors influencing the preference of customers towards Islamic banking: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Economic Laws, 3(1): 48-67. https://doi.org/10.23917/jisel.v3i1.10191   [Google Scholar]
  14. Febriandika NR, Anam S, and Putri ASE (2020). The effect of distributive justice, procedural justice of compensation and emotional intelligence on affective commitments. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 6(1): 34-41. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v6i1.654   [Google Scholar]
  15. Febriandika NR, Hakimi F, and Awalliyah M (2023a). Contagion and spillover effects of global financial markets on the Indonesian Sharia stock index post-COVID-19. Innovations, 20(3): 35-47. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.20(3).2023.04   [Google Scholar]
  16. Febriandika NR, Wati RM, and Hasanah M (2023b). Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: The reaction of Islamic stocks in the energy sector of Indonesia. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 20(1): 218-227. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.20(1).2023.19   [Google Scholar]
  17. Ginting DB (2009). Structural equation model. Media Informatika, 8(3): 121–134.   [Google Scholar]
  18. Hamid A and Masood O (2011). Selection criteria for Islamic home financing: A case study of Pakistan. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 3(2): 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554171111155357   [Google Scholar]
  19. Hanif M (2019). Islamic mortgages: Principles and practice. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 14(5): 967-987. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-02-2018-0088   [Google Scholar]
  20. Hoque ME, Nik Hashim NMH, and Azmi MHB (2018). Moderating effects of marketing communication and financial consideration on customer attitude and intention to purchase Islamic banking products: A conceptual framework. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 9(4): 799-822. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2017-0005   [Google Scholar]
  21. Huda I (2019). The Islamic law perspective of Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta pension fund management. Journal of Islamic Economic Laws, 2(1): 60-87. https://doi.org/10.23917/jisel.v2i1.7664   [Google Scholar]
  22. Hussin SR, Hashim H, Yusof RN, and Alias NN (2013). Relationship between product factors, advertising, and purchase intention of halal cosmetic. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 21(S): 85-100.   [Google Scholar]
  23. Islam MA, Saidin ZH, Ayub MA, and Islam MS (2022). Modelling behavioural intention to buy apartments in Bangladesh: An extended theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Heliyon, 8: e10519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10519   [Google Scholar] PMid:36119894 PMCid:PMC9475322
  24. Ismail S, Azmi F, and Thurasamy R (2014). Selection criteria for Islamic home financing in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Society, 15(1): 97-110.   [Google Scholar]
  25. Jinni N and Amin H (2020). Explaining the effects of Shariah compliance, financial freedom and religiosity on Islamic home financing acceptance in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. Labuan Bulletin of International Business and Finance, 18(1): 62-74. https://doi.org/10.51200/lbibf.v18i1.2688   [Google Scholar]
  26. Johnson CL, Gutter M, Xu Y, Cho SH, and DeVaney S (2016). Perceived value of college as an investment in human and social capital: Views of generations X and Y. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 45(2): 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12195   [Google Scholar]
  27. Kadochnikova E, Boulatova E, Safiullina A, and Suycheva D (2020). Macroeconomic determinants of the mortgage loan. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Iberoamericana y Teoría Social, 25(12): 333-345.   [Google Scholar]
  28. Kedong Y, Zhou S, and Xu T (2019). Research on optimization of index system design and its inspection method: Indicator design and expert assessment quality inspection. Marine Economics and Management, 2(1): 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAEM-10-2019-0010   [Google Scholar]
  29. Kurniawan C, Dewi LC, Maulatsih W, and Gunadi W (2020). Factors influencing housing purchase decisions of millennial generation in Indonesia. International Journal of Management, 11(4): 350-365.   [Google Scholar]
  30. Kyriazos TA (2018). Applied psychometrics: Sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 9: 2207-2230. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.98126   [Google Scholar]
  31. Majid RN, Rahadi RA, Faturohman T, and Hasanah EN (2018). Factors influencing Sharia housing products pricing in Bandung city: A preliminary study. Journal of Islamic, Social, Economics and Development, 3(8): 70-86.   [Google Scholar]
  32. Manurung S (2014). Islamic religiosity and development of zakat institution. Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(2): 197-220. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v1i2.186   [Google Scholar]
  33. Mariana L and Harun H (2020). Analysis of the efficiency level of Sharia rural financing bank (SRFB) using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Journal of Islamic Economic Laws, 3(1): 68-85. https://doi.org/10.23917/jisel.v3i1.10193   [Google Scholar]
  34. Najiyah F and Febriandika NR (2019). The role of government in the zakat management: The implementation of a centralized and decentralized approach (comparative study in Indonesia and Malaysia). In the International Conference on Islamic Economics and Business, Atlantis Press, Malang, Indonesia: 290-292. https://doi.org/10.2991/iconies-18.2019.57   [Google Scholar]
  35. Nuryadin MB (2007). Harga dalam Perspektif Islam. Jurnal Mazahib, 4(1): 86-99.   [Google Scholar]
  36. Ooi JWK, Leh KH, Li WK, Lye KH, and Ong HY (2019). Determinants of potential buyer purchase intention toward life insurance among Generation Y. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.   [Google Scholar]
  37. Qodah SA (2021). Factors influencing customer's intention to use Islamic house financing among Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) academic staff. M.Sc. Thesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia.   [Google Scholar]
  38. Rahayu YS and Sabtiyah S (2019). Analysis of the effect of mortgage income, gold price and inflation rate on rahn financial distribution with return on assets as intervening variable. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 101: 54-56. https://doi.org/10.2991/iconies-18.2019.10   [Google Scholar]
  39. Rahima A (2021). Analisis faktor yang memengaruhi pertimbangan konsumen dalam menggunakan fasilitas kredit pemilikan rumah. Mega Aktiva: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 10(2): 102-114. https://doi.org/10.32833/majem.v10i2.207   [Google Scholar]
  40. Ramcharan R and Crowe C (2013). The impact of house prices on consumer credit: Evidence from an internet bank. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 45(6): 1085-1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12045   [Google Scholar]
  41. Sarfraz A and Mian KA (2022). The impact of values on consumer adoption of takāful with mediating role of religiosity and moderating role of confusion. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 13(10): 2126-2143. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2021-0006   [Google Scholar]
  42. Sayuti MK and Amin H (2020). Integrating the effects of price fairness and Islamic altruism with the TPB model: The case of Islamic mortgage adoption. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 13(5): 791-807. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-07-2019-0077   [Google Scholar]
  43. Soon A and Tan C (2019). An analysis on housing affordability in Malaysian housing markets and the home buyers’ preference. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 13(3): 375-392. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-01-2019-0009   [Google Scholar]
  44. Supriyadi A (2014). Implementation of Islamic economic principles about mortgages. Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies, 2(2): 121-143. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v2i2.1545   [Google Scholar]
  45. Taufik AN and Haryono Y (2021). Determinan generasi y terhadap minat pembelian rumah pada KPR Syariah. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Economics and Business, 6: 1. https://doi.org/10.30631/ijoieb.v6i1.754   [Google Scholar]
  46. Zocchi P (2013). Why do Italian households prefer adjustable rate mortgages? Journal of European Real Estate Research, 6(1): 90-110. https://doi.org/10.1108/17539261311312997   [Google Scholar]