International journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN:2313-626X

Frequency: 12

line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 4, Issue 12 (December 2017), Pages: 10-15

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: Study on building efficient airspace through implementation of free route concept in the Manila FIR

 Author(s):  Z. Xie *, S. Aneeka, Y. X. Lee, Z. W. Zhong

 Affiliation(s):

 School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Republic of Singapore

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.012.003

 Full Text - PDF          XML

 Abstract:

The air traffic volumes in ASEAN region are expected to triple by 2030 based on forecasting results. The concept of Seamless ASEAN Sky has been raised to increase air capacity and efficiency in the region. The current airspace structure may not be capable of meeting the anticipated future air traffic demand. As a result, the authors applied free route airspace structure to accommodate more aircraft under Manila FIR. The methodology proposed in this paper can increase the airspace capacity while decreasing the ATCs workload by using free route airspace concept. A case study was carried out on Manila FIR to examine the effectiveness of this method. 

 © 2017 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Efficient airspace, MATLAB simulation, Free route, Route structure, Philippine FIR

 Article History: Received 10 March 2017, Received in revised form 2 October 2017, Accepted 5 October 2017

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.012.003

 Citation:

 Xie Z, Aneeka S, Lee YX, and Zhong ZW (2017). Study on building efficient airspace through implementation of free route concept in the Manila FIR. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 4(12): 10-15

 Permanent Link:

 http://www.science-gate.com/IJAAS/V4I12/Xie.html

----------------------------------------------

 References (17)

  1. Barrett SD (2004). How do the demands for airport services differ between full-service carriers and low-cost carriers?. Journal of Air Transport Management, 10(1): 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2003.10.006 
  2. Bicchi A and Pallottino L (2000). On optimal cooperative conflict resolution for air traffic management systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 1(4): 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1109/6979.898228 
  3. DeSA UN (2013). World population prospects: The 2012 revision. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.18356/02911eeb-en 
  4. EUROCONTROL (2008). Free Route Airspace (FRA). European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation. Available online at: http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/free-route-airspace     
  5. EUROCONTROL (2015). System for traffic assignment and analysis at a macroscopic level (SAAM). European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation. Available online at: http://www.eurocontrol.int/saam 
  6. Gibbs WW (1995). Free-for-all flights. Scientific American, 273(6): 34-37. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1295-34a 
  7. Han SC, Pei CG, Sui D, and Zuo L (2006). Security analysis of area navigation parallel airway [J]. Acta Aeronautica ET Astronautica Sinica, 27(6): 1023-1027.     
  8. Hart PE, Nilsson NJ, and Raphael B (1968). A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 4(2): 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSC.1968.300136 
  9. Hering H (2005). Air traffic freeway system for Europe (EEC Note 20/05). Eurocontrol Experimental Centre, Brétigny-sur-Orge, France.     
  10. Paielli RA and Erzberger H (1997). Conflict probability estimation for free flight. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 20(3): 588-596. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4081 
  11. Pappas G, Tomlin C, Lygeros J, Godbole D, and Sastry S (1997). A next generation architecture for air traffic management systems. In the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, IEEE, Piscataway, USA, 3: 2405-2410. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.1997.657516 
  12. Rekkas C and Rees M (2008). Towards ADS-B implementation in Europe. In the Tyrrhenian International Workshop on Digital Communications - Enhanced Surveillance of Aircraft and Vehicles (TIWDC/ESAV'08), IEEE, New Jersey, USA: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIWDC.2008.4649019 
  13. RTCA (1995). Final report on free flight implementation. Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, Washington, USA.     
  14. Sunil E, Hoekstra J, Ellerbroek J, Bussink F, Vidosavljevic A, Delahaye D, and Aalmoes R (2016). The influence of traffic structure on airspace capacity. In the 7th International Conference on Research in Air Transportation (ICRAT'16), Philadelphia, USA.     
  15. Tomlin C, Pappas G, Lygeros J, Godbole D, and Sastry S (1996). Hybrid control models of next generation air traffic management. In the International Hybrid Systems Workshop on Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1273: 378-404. http://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0031570 
  16. Xie Z and Zhong ZW (2016). Aircraft path planning under adverse weather condition. In the 3rd International Conference on Mechanics, Electronics and Automation Engineering (ICMEAE'16), EDP Sciences, Les Ulis, France. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20167715001 
  17. Xie Z and Zhong ZW (2016). Changi airport passenger volume forecasting based on an artificial neural network. In the Far East Journal of Electronics and Communications (ICACCI'16), Pushpa Publishing House, Cebu, Philippines, 2: 163-170. https://doi.org/10.17654/ECSV216163