International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences
Int. j. adv. appl. sci.
Print ISSN: 2313-626X
Volume 3, Issue 11 (November 2016), Pages: 1-7
Title: The evaluation and effectiveness of school based assessment among science teachers in Malaysia using CIPP Model
Author(s): Norazilawati Abdullah *, Norwaliza Abdul Wahab, Noraini Mohamed Noh, Eftah Moh Abdullah, Aslina Ahmad
Faculty of Education and Human Development, Sultan Idris Education University, Tanjung Malim, Malaysia
Full Text - PDF XML
The purpose of this study is to identify the effectiveness of School Based Assessment (SBA) in science subject among secondary science teachers using CIPP Model. It also investigates the evaluation of science teachers’ regarding the advantages and disadvantages of SBA. A total of 112 science teachers from 21 secondary schools in Batang Padang District, Perak, Malaysia were involved in this survey. The data from the questionnaires and survey were analyzed using descriptive statistics and statistical inference. Frequency distribution with mean scores and percentages and Pearson correlation analysis were used. Results showed that the dimensions of context, input and product are at a moderate level while the level of process dimension is high. Hypothesis is also accepted, there is no significant relationship between the level of dimensional context, input, process and product in the implementation of SBA with teaching experience. Analysis of the interviews showed that most respondents agree that there are advantages of SBA, thus is suitable with the aim of Malaysia to create a world-class human capital. In conclusion, this study provides new contributions to teachers in Malaysia to implement SBA effectively through training, courses, monitoring and ongoing support from Ministry Of Education.
© 2016 The Authors. Published by IASE.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords: Evaluation, Effectiveness, CIPP model, School based assessment (SBA), Science teachers
Article History: Received 20 August 2016, Received in revised form 15 October 2016, Accepted 27 October 2016
Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2016.11.001
Abdullah N, Abdul Wahab N, Noh NM, Abdullah EM, and Ahmad A (2016). The evaluation and effectiveness of school based assessment among science teachers in Malaysia using CIPP Model. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 3(11): 1-7
|Awang MI (2011). Pelaksanaan pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah: pengetahuan dan amalan guru di sekolah menengah agama milik kerajaan negeri. In the Seminar Majlis Dekan-dekan Pendidikan IPTA2011, Penang, Malaysia.|
|Azhari A (2005). Penilaian Program Pentaksiran Ujian Lisan Berasaskan Sekolah Bahasa Melayu SPM. M.Sc. Thesis, UKM Malaysia.|
|Barak M and Shakhman L (2008). Fostering higher‐order thinking in science class: teachers' reflections. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 14(3): 191-208.|
|Brown GT and Hirschfeld GH (2008). Students' conceptions of assessment: Links to outcomes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 15(1): 3-17.
|Hogan, R. L. (2007). The Historical Development of Program Evaluation: Exploring the Past and Present. Online Journal of Workforce Education and Development, 2(4):1-14.|
|Kouritzin SG and Vizard C (1999). Feedback on feedback: Preservice ESL teachers respond to evaluation practices. TESL Canada journal, 17(1): 16-39.
|Mahamod Z, Embi MA and Yusoff NMRN (2010). Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah: Panduan untuk Guru Bahasa Melayu, Inggeris dan Arab. Penerbit Fakulti Pendidikan, UKM, Bangi, Malaysia.|
|Norazilawati A, Nik ANY, Rosnidar M (2012). Pelaksanaan Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Dalam Mata Pelajaran Sains. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains and Matematik Malaysia, 2(1):78-91.|
|Stufflebeam DL (1971). The use of experimental design in educational evaluation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8(4): 267-274.
|Stufflebeam DL (2002). CIPP evaluation checklist. A tool for applying the fifth installment of the CIPP model to assess long-term enterprises. Retrieved 11 July 2014, Available online at: http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/cippchecklist.htm|
|Stufflebeam DL (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. Proceeding. In the Annual Conference of the Oregon Program Evaluators Network (OPEN), Portland, Oregon, USA.
|Stufflebeam DL and Shinkfield AJ (2007). Evaluation. Theory, Models and Applications. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, USA.|
|Tan AM (2010). Pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah (PBS) di Malaysia: kesediaan guru, isu, dan panduan pelaksanaan. Petaling Jaya, Gerakbudaya Enterprise, Selangor, Malaysia.|