International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 10, Issue 1 (January 2023), Pages: 182-189

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

Effect of Havruta learning method on training satisfaction of military recruits through the mediation of inner motive, creativity, and military service value

 Author(s): 

 Soo-Yun Kim, Dong-Hyung Lee *

 Affiliation(s):

 Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon, South Korea

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8743-858X

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.01.023

 Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of recruit training applied with the Havruta learning method on training satisfaction through inner motive, creativity, and military service value using a structural equation model. Havruta is a learning method in which two people ask questions and discuss in pairs, and it is an effective learning method to enhance inner motive, creativity, and military service value.  For this purpose, inner motive, creativity, military service value, and training satisfaction were measured for 472 recruits who received training applying the Havruta learning method. Statistical analysis such as path analysis and multi-parameter model analysis was performed by inputting the measured values into the structural equation model (SEM). As a result of the CFA (Confirmatory Factor Analysis) of the SEM, the fitness index was found to be suitable as TLI=0.914, CFI=0.928, and RMSEA=0.080.  Also, the validity index satisfied more than the criteria (AVE>0.5 and CR>0.7). As a result of the study, the Havruta effect of recruit training enhances inner motive, creativity, and military service value. As for the mediating effect of training satisfaction, inner motive and military service value had a significant effect, but creativity did not. The army needs to actively review the Havruta learning method in order to improve the satisfaction of recruit training of MZ generation soldiers. In the future, it will be a more meaningful study if you confirm the effect of training with the Havruta learning method on the training achievement of recruits.

 © 2022 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Havruta learning method, Inner motive, Creativity, Military service value, Training satisfaction

 Article History: Received 16 December 2021, Received in revised form 5 September 2022, Accepted 11 October 2022

 Acknowledgment 

No Acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

 Kim SY and Lee DH (2023). Effect of Havruta learning method on training satisfaction of military recruits through the mediation of inner motive, creativity, and military service value. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 10(1): 182-189

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4

 Tables

 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7

----------------------------------------------    

 References (23)

  1. Ahn SB, Huh MD, and Lyu MJ (2012). Effect of blended learning in physical education classes on intrinsic motivation and class satisfaction in female high school students. Educational Research, 54: 165-185. https://doi.org/10.17253/swueri.2012.54..007   [Google Scholar]
  2. Amabile TM (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1): 123-167.   [Google Scholar]
  3. Ben-David Kolikant Y and Genut S (2017). The effect of prior education on students’ competency in digital logic: the case of ultraorthodox Jewish students. Computer Science Education, 27(3-4): 149-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2017.1414364   [Google Scholar]
  4. Byrne BM (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  5. DeCharms R and Muir MS (1978). Motivation: Social approaches. Annual Review of Psychology, 29(1): 91-113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.29.020178.000515   [Google Scholar] PMid:341794
  6. Fornell C and Larcker DF (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104   [Google Scholar]
  7. Hertz-Lazarowitz R and Zelniker T (1995). Cooperative learning in Israel: Historical, cultural and educational perspectives. International Journal of Educational Research, 23(3): 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(95)93613-Z   [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoge CW, Auchterlonie JL, and Milliken CS (2006). Mental health problems, use of mental health services, and attrition from military service after returning from deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan. JAMA, 295(9): 1023-1032. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.9.1023   [Google Scholar] PMid:16507803
  9. Hu LT and Bentler PM (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1): 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118   [Google Scholar]
  10. Hur Y (2016). The effect of Havruta teaching methods on university students individual and group creativity. Korean Journal of General Education, 10(3): 73-106.   [Google Scholar]
  11. Jang YM (2020). The effects of Havruta-based teaching and learning methods on nursing students' academic self-efficacy, critical thinking propensity, learning satisfaction, and academic stress. Journal of the Korean Applied Science and Technology, 37(5): 1366-1377.   [Google Scholar]
  12. Kent O (2006). Interactive text study: A case of Hevruta learning. Journal of Jewish Education, 72(3): 205-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/15244110600990155   [Google Scholar]
  13. Kent O (2010). A theory of Havruta learning. Journal of Jewish Education, 76(3): 215-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2010.501499   [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim SY and Lee DH (2021). The effect of the army smart learning system on the self-directed learning and problem solving ability of officers. Journal of Next-Generation Convergence Technology Association, 5(4): 606-615. https://doi.org/10.33097/JNCTA.2021.05.04.606   [Google Scholar]
  15. Kotwal RS, Montgomery HR, Kotwal BM, Champion HR, Butler FK, Mabry RL, Cain JS, Blackbourne LH, Mechler KK, and Holcomb JB (2011). Eliminating preventable death on the battlefield. Archives of Surgery, 146(12): 1350-1358. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2011.213   [Google Scholar] PMid:21844425
  16. Lim SH (2019). The effects of adult nursing education on the critical thinking disposition, learning commitment, and learning satisfaction of nursing students using the Havruta learning method. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 20(7): 547-554.   [Google Scholar]
  17. Prebensen NK, Woo E, Chen JS, and Uysal M (2013). Motivation and involvement as antecedents of the perceived value of the destination experience. Journal of Travel Research, 52(2): 253-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287512461181   [Google Scholar]
  18. Seok BG (2019). Structural relationships among servant leadership of major professors, creativity, entrepreneurship and career preparation behavior of undergraduate students. Journal of Next-Generation Convergence Technology Association, 3(3): 132-142. https://doi.org/10.33097/JNCTA.2019.03.03.132   [Google Scholar]
  19. Shin H (2020). A case study on value creation of fashion brands using content collaboration targeting MZ generation. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 28(6): 830-844. https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2020.28.6.830   [Google Scholar]
  20. Son JH, Kim CS, and Lee HS (2021). A study on the response of each generation to the communication characteristics of the MZ generation-Focusing on generation MZ, generation X, and baby boomers. Journal of Communication Design, 77: 203-216.  https://doi.org/10.25111/jcd.2021.77.14   [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang Y, Peng H, Huang R, Hou Y, and Wang J (2008). Characteristics of distance learners: Research on relationships of learning motivation, learning strategy, self‐efficacy, attribution and learning results. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 23(1): 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510701815277   [Google Scholar]
  22. Woodruff TD (2017). Who should the military recruit? The effects of institutional, occupational, and self-enhancement enlistment motives on soldier identification and behavior. Armed Forces & Society, 43(4): 579-607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X17695360   [Google Scholar]
  23. Yeh YP (2014). Exploring the impacts of employee advocacy on job satisfaction and organizational commitment: Case of Taiwanese airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management, 36: 94-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.01.002   [Google Scholar]