International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 9, Issue 3 (March 2022), Pages: 31-38

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: Sustainable development of regions: Modeling the management of economic security of innovative entrepreneurship

 Author(s): Olga Khodakivska 1, Serhii Kobets 2, Iryna Bachkir 3, Liliia Martynova 4, Viacheslav Klochan 5, *, Iryna Klochan 6, Iryna Hnatenko 7

 Affiliation(s):

 1National Scientific Center "Institute of Agrarian Economics", Kyiv, Ukraine
 2Department of Economic Theory and Economic Cybernetics, National University "Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic", Poltava, Ukraine
 3Department of Management, Kremenchuk Mykhailo Ostrohradskyi National University, Kremenchuk, Ukraine
 4Department of Economic Law, Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University, Severodonetsk, Ukraine
 5Management and Marketing Department, Mykolaiv National Agrarian University, Mykolaiv, Ukraine
 6Department of Economic Cybernetics and Mathematical Modeling, Mykolaiv National Agrarian University, Mykolaiv, Ukraine
 7Department of Entrepreneurship and Business, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, Kyiv, Ukraine

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8691-8733

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2022.03.004

 Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to develop a methodology for assessing the level of economic security of innovative enterprises based on the use of taxonomic analysis of the main indicators of their institutional support for the optimal organization of management and forecasting the economic development of the regions of their operation. The method proposed in the article consists in assessing the system of indicators of institutional support for innovative entrepreneurship within the framework of the Institute of Human Capital, the Institute of Financial and Credit Component, the Institute for the Implementation of Innovations in Industry, the Institute of Export Activities, the Institute of Intellectual Property, the Institute of Infrastructure Support, the Institute of Regulatory and Legal Support, the Institute of Public-Private Partnership and Mediation, the Institute of Information Support. The advantage of this technique over the methods for assessing economic security proposed in other scientific works is that the summary assessment indicator is universal and its interpretation makes it possible to identify the relationship between the main integrated indicators for all regions of the studied country, taking into account the unevenness of their economic development, as well as to analyze the question of the causal nature of the transformation of the institutional environment and its consequent. The practical significance of systematized indicators of institutional support, influencing the modeling of economic security management of innovative entrepreneurship, is that they can be used in forecasting the economic development of regions of the country and developing appropriate measures to regulate this process. 

 © 2022 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Economic security, Taxonomic analysis, Institutional support, Regional development, Mode 

 Article History: Received 4 August 2021, Received in revised form 25 November 2021, Accepted 27 December 2021

 Acknowledgment 

No Acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

 Khodakivska O, Kobets S, and Bachkir I et al. (2022). Sustainable development of regions: Modeling the management of economic security of innovative entrepreneurship. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 9(3): 31-38

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1

 Tables

 Table 1   

----------------------------------------------    

 References (20)

  1. Barczyk J, Musiał W, and Žukovskis J (2019). The barriers and opportunities to the development of small business in rural areas. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 41(1): 114-126. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2019.11   [Google Scholar]
  2. Chopin P, Blazy JM, Guindé L, Tournebize R, and Doré T (2017). A novel approach for assessing the contribution of agricultural systems to the sustainable development of regions with multi-scale indicators: Application to Guadeloupe. Land Use Policy, 62: 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.021   [Google Scholar]
  3. Diaz RA (2011). Planning for sustainable development: Strategic alignment in Peruvian regions and cities. Futures, 43(8): 908-918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.06.014   [Google Scholar]
  4. Ferjencik M (2020). Practical safety management for small or medium enterprises. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 68: 104281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104281   [Google Scholar]
  5. Hnatenko I (2020). Formation of state priorities of business development in the conditions of innovative economy. Ph.D. Dissertation, National Academy of Management, Kyiv, Ukraine.   [Google Scholar]
  6. Hnatenko I, Kuksa I, Naumenko I, Baldyk D, and Rubezhanska V (2020a). Infrastructure of innovation enterprise: Features of formation and regulation in modern market conditions. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 42: 97-104. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2020.10   [Google Scholar]
  7. Hnatenko I, Orlova-Kurilova O, Shtuler I, Serzhanov V, and Rubezhanska V (2020b). An approach to innovation potential evaluation as a means of enterprise management improving. International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, 7(1): 112-118.   [Google Scholar]
  8. Kinnear S and Ogden I (2014). Planning the innovation agenda for sustainable development in resource regions: A central Queensland case study. Resources Policy, 39: 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.10.009   [Google Scholar]
  9. Koshkina I and Sharamko M (2015). Economic security and internal control of the academic research projects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214: 858-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.741   [Google Scholar]
  10. Miao C, Duan M, Sun X, and Wu X (2020). Safety management efficiency of China’s coal enterprises and its influencing factors-Based on the DEA-Tobit two-stage model. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 140: 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.04.020   [Google Scholar]
  11. Mуkhalchenko H (2018). The improvement of management of social and labor relations as one of the directions of economic development. Social and Labour Relations: Theory and Practice, 8(2): 56-68. https://doi.org/10.21511/slrtp.8(2).2018.06   [Google Scholar]
  12. Pan WT, Zhuang ME, Zhou YY, and Yang JJ (2021). Research on sustainable development and efficiency of China's E-Agriculture based on a data envelopment analysis-Malmquist model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162: 120298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120298   [Google Scholar]
  13. Pineda AL and Cerón JGC (2019). Evaluation of sustainable development in the sub-regions of Antioquia (Colombia) using multi-criteria composite indices: A tool for prioritizing public investment at the subnational level. Environmental Development, 32: 100442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2019.05.001   [Google Scholar]
  14. RathaKrishnan L and Santhy K (2002). Globalisation, Multinational Corporation and regional development. Management and Labour Studies, 27(3): 191-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X0202700304   [Google Scholar]
  15. Samborskyi O, Isai O, Hnatenko I, Parkhomenko O, Rubezhanska V, and Yershova O (2020). Modeling of foreign direct investment impact on economic growth in a free market. Accounting, 6(5): 705-712. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.6.014   [Google Scholar]
  16. Semenov A, Kuksa I, Hnatenko I, Sazonova T, Babiy L, and Rubezhanska V (2021). Management of energy and resource-saving innovation projects at agri-food enterprises. TEM Journal, 10(2): 751-756. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM102-32   [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang J, Shahbaz M, and Song M (2021). Evaluating energy economic security and its influencing factors in China. Energy, 229: 120638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120638   [Google Scholar]
  18. Wu A, Wang Zh, and Chen S (2017). Impact of specific investments, governance mechanisms and behaviors on the performance of cooperative innovation projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3): 504-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.12.005   [Google Scholar]
  19. Yu F, Guo Y, Le-Nguyen K, Barnesc SJ, and Zhanga W (2016). The impact of government subsidies and enterprises’ R&D investment: A panel data study from renewable energy in China. Policy, 89: 106-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.009   [Google Scholar]
  20. Zos-Kior М, Shkurupii O, Hnatenko I, Fedirets O, Shulzhenko I, Energy and Rubezhanska V (2021). Modeling of the investment program formation process of ecological management of the agrarian cluster. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(1): 571-571. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n1p571   [Google Scholar]