International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 9, Issue 1 (January 2022), Pages: 55-70

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: A proposed electronic tool for managing educational procedures, following-up teachers' performance in the classroom, and measuring their attitudes

 Author(s): Sami Abdelhamid Mohamed Issa 1, 2, *

 Affiliation(s):

 1Computer Department, Community College, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
 2Educational Technology Department, Specific Education College, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4515-579X

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2022.01.008

 Abstract:

The educational process depends on many procedures, which lead to positive educational outcomes. The research depends on modern technology in the design and development of an electronic tool that manages the teaching process in the classroom from beginning to end. The purpose of the research is to monitor the teacher's procedures by following up on all teaching procedures using an electronic tool for managing the educational process. The teacher implemented all educational lesson procedures in the classroom through the proposed electronic tool according to its prior preparation. The researcher designed a cognitive achievement test for students of the experimental and control groups to measure the effectiveness of the electronic tool. An attitude scale was applied to teachers to identify their attitude toward using the tool in monitoring procedures in the classroom to ensure the effectiveness of the proposed electronic tool in developing the educational process and enriching the academic situation. The research's results indicated that using the proposed electronic tool improved students' educational achievement by comparing the students' results in the experimental and control groups. The teachers' attitude toward using the tool was also characterized as favorable and desired. The research recommended applying the proposed electronic tool to a more significant number of teachers in different specializations, using the tool reports in overcoming problems in the classroom, and conducting more studies related to performance follow-up and observation in the classroom. 

 © 2021 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Electronic tool, Managing education procedures, Performance monitor, Attitude measurement

 Article History: Received 11 July 2021, Received in revised form 8 October 2021, Accepted 9 November 2021

 Acknowledgment 

Deanship of Scientific Research at Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University in Saudi Arabia has funded this research through research proposal No. "16951/02/2020." The researcher extends his thanks, appreciation, and gratitude to their support and funding of this research project.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

 Issa SAM (2022). A proposed electronic tool for managing educational procedures, following-up teachers' performance in the classroom, and measuring their attitudes. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 9(1): 55-70

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4 Fig. 5 Fig. 6 Fig. 7 Fig. 8 Fig. 9 Fig. 10 Fig. 11 Fig. 12 Fig. 13 Fig. 14 Fig. 15 Fig. 16 Fig. 17 Fig. 18 Fig. 19 Fig. 20 Fig. 21 Fig. 22 Fig. 23 Fig. 24 Fig. 25 Fig. 26 Fig. 27 Fig. 28 

 Tables

 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7  Table 8   

----------------------------------------------    

 References (17)

  1. Akpotu NE and Oghuvbu EP (2004). Performance appraisal of the Nigerian secondary school teachers: The students perspectives. International Studies in Educational Administration, 32(3): 44-57.   [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Ruwaithi I and Al-Roasaa T (2013). Evaluating the performance of science teachers in teaching the first intermediate grade course according to suggested standards for teaching. Education and Psychology Message, 42: 93-116.   [Google Scholar]
  3. Azmy NG (2008). E-learning technology. House of Arab thought, Cairo, Egypt.
  4. Darling-Hammond L (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1): 1-46. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000   [Google Scholar]
  5. David AP and Macayanan JV (2010). Assessment of teacher performance. The Assessment Handbook, 3: 65-76.   [Google Scholar]
  6. El-Desouky MI (2012). Readings in informatics and education. Dar Al-Sahab for Publishing and Distribution, Cairo, Egypt: 162-170. 
  7. Elgazzar AE (2014). Developing E-Learning environments for field practitioners and developmental researchers: A third revision of an ISD model to meet e-learning and distance learning innovations. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2): 29-37. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2014.22005   [Google Scholar]
  8. Fasko D (2001). Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4): 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_09   [Google Scholar]
  9. Ford-Brocato J (2004). Teacher and administrator perceptions of teacher performance evaluation systems in two Georgia public school districts. Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  10. Gabriel M (2005). Creating effective educational environments: Online instructors define best practices. In the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Phoenix, USA: 2229-2234.   [Google Scholar]
  11. Haydar MA and Hammoud FS (2018). The evaluation of performance of computer’s teachers in private schools accordance to the standards of the automated computer’s teachers. Al-Ustath Journal for Human and Social Sciences, 225(3): 273-304. https://doi.org/10.36473/ujhss.v225i3.214   [Google Scholar]
  12. Horng JS, Hong JC, ChanLin LJ, Chang SH, and Chu HC (2005). Creative teachers and creative teaching strategies. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(4): 352-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00445.x   [Google Scholar]
  13. Kember D (2000). Action learning, action research: Improving the quality of teaching and learning. Routledge, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203016343   [Google Scholar] PMCid:PMC2270145
  14. Kurfalı M, Arifoğlu A, Tokdemir G, and Paçin Y (2017). Adoption of e-government services in Turkey. Computers in Human Behavior, 66: 168-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.041   [Google Scholar]
  15. Muhammad AA (2015). Integrated monitoring system for schools. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Palestine: 1-156.   [Google Scholar]
  16. NCATE (2000). Performance-based accreditation standards. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education,‪ 52 (11): 14. Available online at: https://ncte.gov.in/website/index.aspx
  17. Oyedmi O (2015). ICT and effective school management: administer perspective. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science, 2217: 249-252. Available online at: https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/41dd1d6a-d388-3c51-8229-74c64a4f97f7/