International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 9, Issue 1 (January 2022), Pages: 20-26

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: Modeling of the comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of economic entities: Management aspect

 Author(s): Lesia Zaburanna 1, Yaryna Mayovets 2, Mykola Kalashnyk 3, *

 Affiliation(s):

 1Department of Administrative Management and Foreign Economic Activity, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
 2Department of Economic Theory, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine
 3Department of Marketing, Economics, Management and Administration, National Academy of Management, Kyiv, Ukraine

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1917-572X

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2022.01.003

 Abstract:

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused an unprecedented structural change in the current evolutionary development of the national economy of Ukraine. Situational trends that arise in the open economy of the country require reactive changes in the conditions for doing business and force public authorities to update strategies or mechanisms to support it. At the same time, a number of explicit factors, including unemployment and inflation, further exacerbate the problems in business activities. This makes it necessary to search for relevant methods that would allow interested stakeholders to carry out uninterrupted diagnostics of the state of entrepreneurship development and, on this basis, determine effective government policy tools to support this sector of the economy. Important management measures are the current assessment of the business sector, determination of its future development, and forecasting the consequences of the impact of the external environment on the activities of enterprises. At the same time, the updated methods should take into account the evolution of the development of the national economy and the specifics of the modern activities of large, medium, and small enterprises in Ukraine. The purpose of the article is to develop a relevant methodology for assessing the current activities of business entities in the managerial aspect, as well as modeling the forecast for the development of this sector of the economy, taking into account the specifics of the functioning of the national economy of Ukraine. The use of the methodology proposed by the authors will make it possible to systematically assess the current state of entrepreneurship development and respond in advance to negative factors that cause its inert development. 

 © 2021 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Entrepreneurship, Management, Unemployment, Inflation, Integral assessment, Business entities' activities

 Article History: Received 19 July 2021, Received in revised form 24 October 2021, Accepted 31 October 2021

 Acknowledgment 

No Acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

 Zaburanna L, Mayovets Y, and Kalashnyk M (2022). Modeling of the comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of economic entities: Management aspect. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 9(1): 20-26

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 

 Tables

 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7    

----------------------------------------------    

 References (20)

  1. Alekseenko V, Seredina N, and Kosaynova V (2019). Integrated assessment of leading strategic sustainability for integrated business structures. In: Strielkowski W (Ed.), Sustainable leadership for entrepreneurs and academics: 201-212. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15495-0_21   [Google Scholar]
  2. Anwar M, Clauss T, and Issah WB (2021). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance in emerging markets: The mediating role of opportunity recognition. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00457-w   [Google Scholar]
  3. Bogatyrev SY (2021). Modern techniques for the comparative method of business valuation. Financial Analytics: Science and Experience, 14(1): 44-64. https://doi.org/10.24891/fa.14.1.44   [Google Scholar]
  4. Brotons JM and Sansalvador ME (2018). Fuzzy systems in business valuation. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 26(Suppl. 1): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488518400019   [Google Scholar]
  5. Coles T, Ritchie BW, and Wang J (2021). Building business resilience to external shocks: Conceptualizing the role of social networks to small tourism and hospitality businesses. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 48: 210-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.06.012   [Google Scholar]
  6. King WR and Teo T (1996). Integrating between business planning and information systems planning. Information and Management, 30(6): 309-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(96)01076-2   [Google Scholar]
  7. Krulicky T, Horak J, and Skulcova K (2021). Business valuation in times of crisis. In the SHS Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, 91: 01039. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219101039   [Google Scholar]
  8. Kuratko DF, Hornsby JS, and Covin JG (2014). Diagnosing a firm's internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 57(1): 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.08.009   [Google Scholar]
  9. Oh SJ, Sung MG, and Kim HJ (2018). Development of indicators for assessment of technology integrated business models in climate change responses. Journal of Climate Change Research, 9(4): 435-443. https://doi.org/10.15531/KSCCR.2018.9.4.435   [Google Scholar]
  10. Oliveira FB and Zotes LP (2018). Valuation methodologies for business startups: a bibliographical study and survey. Brazilian Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(1): 96-111. https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2018.v15.n1.a9   [Google Scholar]
  11. Pavlova O, Pavlov K, Horal L, Novosad O, Korol S, Perevozova I, and Popadynet N (2021). Integral estimation of the competitiveness level of the western Ukrainian gas distribution companies. Accounting, 7(5): 1073-1084. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2021.3.001   [Google Scholar]
  12. Qi H (2010). Valuation methodologies and emerging markets. Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, 5(1): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-9156.1064   [Google Scholar]
  13. Risi D (2020). Business and society research drawing on institutionalism: Integrating normative and descriptive research on values. Business and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320928959   [Google Scholar]
  14. Sarshar K, Theling T, and Loos P (2006). Integrated business process modeling and simulation–A case from the construction industry. In: Martínez M and Scherer R (Eds.), eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction: 57-64. 1st Edition, CRC Press, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003060819-10   [Google Scholar]
  15. Savitri E, DP E, and Syahza A (2021). Can innovation mediate the effect of adaptability, entrepreneurial orientation on business performance? Management Science Letters, 11(8): 2301-2312. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2021.3.014   [Google Scholar]
  16. SSSU (2021). State statistical service of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine. Available online at: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/publ9_u.htm
  17. Thong JY (2001). Resource constraints and information systems implementation in Singaporean small businesses. Omega, 29(2): 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00035-9   [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang H, Veltri A, Calvo-Amodio J, and Haapala KR (2021). Making the business case for sustainable manufacturing in small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises: A systems decision making approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287: 125038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125038   [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhuravka F, Shkarupa O, Aiyedogbon JO, Adeyinka OB, and Shkarupa I (2020). Factors of macroeconomic growth in Nigeria: wages demand, taxes, and entrepreneurship development. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 17(1): 242-252. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(1).2020.21   [Google Scholar]
  20. Zos-Kior М, Shkurupii O, Hnatenko I, Fedirets O, Shulzhenko I, and Rubezhanska V (2021). Modeling of the investment program formation process of ecological management of the agrarian cluster. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(1): 571-571. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n1p571   [Google Scholar]