International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 8, Issue 9 (September 2021), Pages: 1-6

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: The relationship between social and financial performance with the objectives of the kingdom vision (2030)

 Author(s): Hichem Dkhili *, Lassad Ben Dhiab

 Affiliation(s):

 College of Business Administration, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5773-1494

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2021.09.001

 Abstract:

The objective of this paper is the study of the link between social and financial performance and the objectives of the Kingdom's Vision 2030. The methodological tool of this contribution tries to measure the effect of social and financial performance and the objectives of the Kingdom's Vision 2030. The main purpose of the research is focused on the empirical approach justified by the use of a linear model. The paper presents the results of an empirical analysis that showed a positive effect of social and financial performance on the objectives of the Kingdom's Vision 2030. The results found suggest that size, risk, and sector do not moderate the relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. The results showed a positive impact between social and financial performance with the objectives of the Kingdom Vision (2030) and implied that social and financial performance has a positive and significant relationship with the Kingdom Vision (2030). The results of the research can be useful for companies to promote the social and financial performance for a good realization of the Kingdom Vision (2030) and provide information to take the necessary policy suggestions to maintain the social performance and limit the average of financial performance. 

 © 2021 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Social performance, Financial performance, Saudi vision 2030

 Article History: Received 14 February 2021, Received in revised form 2 May 2021, Accepted 25 May 2021

 Acknowledgment 

No acknowledgment.

 Funding

This research was funded by the deanship of Scientific Research, Northern Border University, and The APC was funded by grant No. (435/000).

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

 Dkhili H and Dhiab LB (2021). The relationship between social and financial performance with the objectives of the kingdom vision (2030). International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 8(9): 1-6

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 

 Tables

 Table 1 

----------------------------------------------

 References (18)

  1. Bowen EG (1953). The influence of meteoritic dust on rainfall. Australian Journal of Physics, 6(4): 490-497. https://doi.org/10.1071/PH530490   [Google Scholar]
  2. Branzei O, Vertinsky I, Takahashi T, and Zhang W (2001). Corporate environmentalism across cultures: A comparative field study of Chinese and Japanese executives. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1(3): 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/147059580113003   [Google Scholar]
  3. Carroll AB (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4): 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G   [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis M and Putnam H (1960). A computing procedure for quantification theory. Journal of the ACM, 7(3): 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1145/321033.321034   [Google Scholar]
  5. Dhiab LB and Dkhili H (2019). Impact of income, trade, urbanization, and financial development on CO2 emissions in the GCC countries. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 6(7): 36-42. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2019.07.005   [Google Scholar]
  6. Dkhili H and Dhiab LB (2019). Environmental management efficiency of GCC countries: Linking between composite index of environmental performance, socio-political and economic dimensions. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1: 57-69. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.1-05   [Google Scholar]
  7. Essid M and Berland N (2010). Les indicateurs de la RSE dans les entreprises françaises: ”l’usine à gaz responsable”. In the 31e Congrès de l'Association francophone de comptabilité, Nice, France.   [Google Scholar]
  8. Gond JP and Mullenbach-Servaryre A (2004). Les fondements the´oriques de la responsabilite´ socie´tale de l’entreprise. Revue des Sciences de Gestion, 205: 93–116.   [Google Scholar]
  9. Husted BW (2005). Culture and ecology: A cross-national study of the determinants of environmental sustainability. Management International Review, 45(3): 349–371.   [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaplan RS (1984). The evolution of management accounting. The Accounting Review, 59: 390-418.   [Google Scholar]
  11. La Torre M, Leo S, and Panetta IC (2021). Banks and environmental, social and governance drivers: Follow the market or the authorities? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2132   [Google Scholar]
  12. Morosini P, Shane S, and Singh H (1998). National cultural distance and cross-border acquisition performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 137-158. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490029   [Google Scholar]
  13. Park YE and Javed Y (2020). Insights discovery through hidden sentiment in big data: Evidence from Saudi Arabia's financial sector. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(6): 457-464. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.457   [Google Scholar]
  14. Peng MW, Sun SL, Pinkham B, and Chen H (2009). The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3): 63-81. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.43479264   [Google Scholar]
  15. Ringov D and Zollo M (2007). The impact of national culture on corporate social performance. Corporate Governance, 7(4): 476-485. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700710820551   [Google Scholar]
  16. Ullmann F, Gerhartz W, Yamamoto YS, Campbell FT, Pfefferkorn R and Rounsaville JF (1985). Ullmann's encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. VCH Publishers, Weinheim, Germany.   [Google Scholar]
  17. Vachon S (2010). International operations and sustainable development: Should national culture matter? Sustainable Development, 18(6): 350-361. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.398   [Google Scholar]
  18. Wood DJ (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4): 691-718. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279616   [Google Scholar]