International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12

line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 8, Issue 4 (April 2021), Pages: 17-22

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: The degree of satisfaction of preparatory year students regarding academic guidance services at prince Sattam bin Abdul-Aziz university: A case study

 Author(s): Abdul-Wasea Abdul-Ghani Almekhlafi 1, *, Galal Abdulqader Ahmed Alashaari 2

 Affiliation(s):

 1Community College, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
 2College of Science and Humanities, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4145-6384

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2021.04.003

 Abstract:

The focus of this study is to examine the students’ degree of satisfaction towards the academic counseling or guidance services during the preparatory year at Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University for the academic year 2020-2021 and report the difference, if any, in the level of this satisfaction based on the difference of the students’ gender. This study used a self-administered survey as an instrument for data collection. The final sample consists of 440 students in Medical and Engineering Colleges. We find that there is a moderate level of satisfaction towards the services of academic guidance offered to the students. In addition, we find that there is a significant difference in the level of satisfaction towards the services of academic guidance by the gender at 5% level. The findings of this study are important for policymakers at the university and college levels. This study suggests that the colleges should increase their academic guidance services offered to students during their studying the preparatory year. Moreover, unifying the level of academic guidance services provided to both male and female sections in a manner to achieve the quality of this service provided to male and female students. 

 © 2021 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Satisfaction, Guidance services, Preparatory year

 Article History: Received 25 August 2020, Received in revised form 29 November 2020, Accepted 1 December 2020

 Acknowledgment:

This publication was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

  Almekhlafi AWAG and Alashaari GAA (2021). The degree of satisfaction of preparatory year students regarding academic guidance services at prince Sattam bin Abdul-Aziz university: A case study. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 8(4): 17-22

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 No Figure

 Tables

 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3

----------------------------------------------

 References (16)

  1. Abu Hasan HF, Ilias A, Abd Rahman R, and Abd Razak MZ (2008). Service quality and student satisfaction: A case study at private higher education institutions. International Business Research, 1(3): 163-175. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v1n3p163   [Google Scholar]
  2. Alghamdi OS (2015). Satisfaction of preparatory year students with university services. World Journal of Education, 5(5): 117-129. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v5n5p117   [Google Scholar]
  3. Al‐Saud LMS (2013). Learning style preferences of first–year dental students at King Saud University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Influence of gender and GPA. Journal of Dental Education, 77(10): 1371-1378. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2013.77.10.tb05612.x   [Google Scholar] PMid:24098042
  4. Engberg ME and Mayhew MJ (2007). The influence of first-year "success" courses on student learning and democratic outcomes. Journal of College Student Development, 48(3): 241-258. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2007.0023   [Google Scholar]
  5. Fricker T (2015). The relationship between academic advising and student success in Canadian colleges: A review of the literature. College Quarterly, 18(4): n4. Available online at:          https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1095959
  6. Gaughf NW, Smith PL, and Williams DA (2013). Faculty and student perceptions of academic counselling services at an academic health science center. Perspectives on Medical Education, 2(3): 165-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-013-0056-1   [Google Scholar] PMid:23670693 PMCid:PMC3722373
  7. Grites TJ (1979). Academic advising: Getting us through the eighties. AAHE-ERIC/Higher Education Research Report No. 7, American Association for Higher Education, Washington, D.C., USA.   [Google Scholar]
  8. Hamdi MS (2007). MASACAD: A multi-agent approach to information customization for the purpose of academic advising of students. Applied Soft Computing, 7(3): 746-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2006.02.001   [Google Scholar]
  9. Jensen AR, Wright AS, Kim S, Horvath KD, and Calhoun KE (2012). Educational feedback in the operating room: A gap between resident and faculty perceptions. The American Journal of Surgery, 204(2): 248-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.08.019   [Google Scholar] PMid:22537472
  10. Kebriaei A, Roudbari M, Rakhshani Nejad M, and Mirlotfi P (2005). Assessing quality of educational services at Zahedan University of Medical Sciences. Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (TABIB-E-SHARGH), 7(2); 139-146.   [Google Scholar]
  11. Khalil A and Williamson J (2014). Role of academic advisors in the success of engineering students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1): 73-79.   [Google Scholar]
  12. Larson J, Johnson A, Aiken-Wisniewski SA, and Barkemeyer J (2018). What is academic advising? An application of analytic induction. NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising Journal, 38(2): 81-93. https://doi.org/10.12930/0271-9517-38.2.81   [Google Scholar]
  13. McMullen MG (2014). The value and attributes of an effective preparatory English program: Perceptions of Saudi University students. English Language Teaching, 7(7): 131-140. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n7p131   [Google Scholar]
  14. Peluso DL, Carleton RN, and Asmundson GJG (2011). Depression symptoms in Canadian psychology graduate students: Do research productivity, funding, and the academic advisory relationship play a role? Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 43(2): 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022624   [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith L and Abouammoh A (2013). Higher education in Saudi Arabia: Reforms, challenges and priorities. In: Smith L and Abouammoh A (Eds.), Higher Education in Saudi Arabia, Higher Education Dynamics, Vol 40, Springer, Dordrecht, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6321-0   [Google Scholar]
  16. Tan KC and Kek SW (2004). Service quality in higher education using an enhanced SERVQUAL approach. Quality in Higher Education, 10(1): 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1353832242000195032   [Google Scholar]