International Journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN: 2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 8, Issue 10 (October 2021), Pages: 51-58

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: Public-private partnership as a factor in the formation of the tourist potential of Russian territories

 Author(s): Olga Vladimirovna Rogach 1, *, Elena Viktorovna Frolova 1, Irina Andreevna Rozhdestvenskaya 2, Lyubov Semenovna Morozova 3, Natalya Vladimirovna Buley 1

 Affiliation(s):

 1Faculty of Management, Russian State Social University, Moscow, Russia
 2Department of State and Municipal Management, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
 3Higher School of Business, Management, and Law, Russian State University of Tourism and Services Studies, Čerkizovo, Russia

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3031-4575

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2021.10.007

 Abstract:

Public-private partnership is one of the most significant factors in the development of tourist attractiveness of Russian territories, a mechanism for improving the quality and differentiation of tourist services. The authors aim to determine the possibilities and limitations of using the mechanism of public-private partnership in the process of forming the tourist potential of Russian territories. The study used a set of general theoretical research methods: classification, systematization, etc. The key research methods are the analysis of documents on the research problem, as well as a focus group study, where the heads of Russian municipalities acted like experts. Barriers to the development of public-private partnership practices in tourism are the following: gaps in the legal framework, the complexity of project approval procedures, the lack of effective support for these practices in the media, problems of the investment climate, the orientation of PPP projects to large businesses with an insufficient number of successful commercial players in the tourism market. The results of the study show that the favorable investment climate of the municipality is the dominant factor in the development of public-private partnerships in the field of tourism. A comprehensive approach to the development of public-private partnership projects include the following measures: the formation of institutional conditions, information and consulting support for entrepreneurs, the removal of organizational barriers, the introduction of various types of benefits and preferences for business representatives. 

 © 2021 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Public-private partnership, Tourism potential, Municipality, Government, Business

 Article History: Received 4 May 2021, Received in revised form 21 July 2021, Accepted 22 July 2021

 Acknowledgment 

No Acknowledgment.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 Citation:

 Rogach OV, Frolova EV, and Rozhdestvenskaya IA et al. (2021). Public-private partnership as a factor in the formation of the tourist potential of Russian territories. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 8(10): 51-58

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 Fig. 2 

 Tables

 Table 1  

----------------------------------------------

 References (16)

  1. Amo MDH and De Stefano MC (2019). Public-private partnership as an innovative approach for sustainable tourism in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 11(2): 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-11-2018-0078   [Google Scholar]
  2. Cahyanto IP, Liu-Lastres B, and Edwards C (2020). Developing a resilience-based adaptive co-management framework: Public sectors’ insights on the role of tourism. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 13(2): 204-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2020.1759611   [Google Scholar]
  3. Frolova EV, Rogach OV, Kabanova EEE, and Ryabova TM (2016). Domestic tourist market in the population estimates: A sociological analysis. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 7: 698-705.   [Google Scholar]
  4. Frolova EV, Ryabova TM, Kabanova EEE, Rogach OV, and Vetrova EA (2017). Domestic tourism in Russian Federation: Population estimations, resources and development constraints. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 8: 436-445.   [Google Scholar]
  5. Frost W and Laing J (2018). Public–private partnerships for nature-based tourist attractions: The failure of Seal Rocks. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(6): 942-956. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1423319   [Google Scholar]
  6. González-Morales O and Talavera AS (2019). CSR as a strategy for public-private relationships in protected island territories: Fuerteventura, Canary Islands. Island Studies Journal, 14(1): 147-162. https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.83   [Google Scholar]
  7. Gordon A (2014). What to see and how to see it: Tourists, residents, and the beginnings of the walking tour in nineteenth-century Quebec City. Journal of Tourism History, 6(1): 74-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1755182X.2013.868533   [Google Scholar]
  8. Higgins-Desbiolles F (2020). Socialising tourism for social and ecological justice after COVID-19. Tourism Geographies, 22(3): 610-623. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1757748   [Google Scholar]
  9. Ly TP and Zhang C (2019). Why public–private cooperation is not prevalent in national parks within centralized countries. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 24(12): 1109-1125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2019.1666154   [Google Scholar]
  10. Magomedova NI (2016). Aspects of the development of public-private partnerships in tourism in the Russian Federation under sanction. UEPS: Management, Economics, Politics, Sociology, 3: 42-48.   [Google Scholar]
  11. Marcouiller DW and Westeren KI (2019). Cultural tourism and rural entrepreneurship: A case study of a Scandinavian literary festival. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 11(3): 509-524. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12200   [Google Scholar]
  12. Mikhoparov NI (2019). Peculiarities of the state tourism policy in the Chuvash republic: Regional experience and methods of its improvement. Contemporary Problems of Social Work, 5(1): 92-99. https://doi.org/10.17922/2412-5466-2019-5-1-92-99   [Google Scholar]
  13. Nguyen NT, Nguyen BPU, and Tran TT (2020). Application of grey system theory and ARIMA model to forecast factors of tourism: A case of Binh Thuan Province in Vietnam. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 7(1): 87-99. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2020.01.009   [Google Scholar]
  14. Pearce PL and Wu MY (2015). Soft infrastructure at tourism sites: Identifying key issues for Asian tourism from case studies. Tourism Recreation Research, 40(1):120-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2015.1010361   [Google Scholar]
  15. Top M and Sungur C (2019). Opinions and evaluations of stakeholders in the implementation of the public-private partnership (PPP) model in integrated health campuses (city hospitals) in Turkey. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 34(1): 241-263. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2644   [Google Scholar] PMid:30156737
  16. Vinichenko MV, Rybakova MV, Malyshev MA, Bondaletova NF, and Chizhankova IV (2019). Improving the efficiency of the negotiation process in the social partnership system. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(1): 92-104. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1(8)   [Google Scholar]