International journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN:2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 6, Issue 9 (September 2019), Pages: 1-12

----------------------------------------------

 Review Paper

 Title: The impact of supply chain risks on supply chain performance: Empirical evidence from the manufacturing of Malaysia

 Author(s): Muhammad Saeed Shahbaz 1, Shazia Kazi 2, Nadeem Ul Kareem Bhatti 3, Suhail Ahmed abbasi 3, Raja Zuraidah RM Rasi 1, *

 Affiliation(s):

 1Faculty of Technology Management and Business, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM), Johor, Malaysia
 2Faculty of Commerce, Economics and Management Sciences, Isra University, Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan
 3Department of Civil Engineering, Quaid e Awam University of Engineering Science and Technology, Larkana Campus, Pakistan

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5125-4321

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2019.09.001

 Abstract:

Nowadays, competition has shifted from organization to industry level so any disruption can not only disturb organization but also affect the whole industry. Although Malaysia is known from palm oil and rubber manufacturing sector has the highest growth rate (7.1%) and the second contributor to GDP and employer. After extensive literature view, it has found that various disruptions have been reported that not only disrupt Malaysian manufacturing but also a global business but there is no study available the empirically assess these risks. This is an empirical investigation and data was collected through a questionnaire distributed by systemic probability sampling to listed Manufacturing organizations listed in the Federation of Manufacturing Malaysia by emails. Final and purified data was analyzed through Structural Equational Modeling through Smart PLS. Total three types of risks were assessed namely logistic side risks, collaboration side risks, and finance side risks. It has been found that although all three types have a negative impact on supply chain performance only logistic side risks is effecting significantly. This study will help managers to understand how supply chain risks are affecting and what type of risks they should be more aware. Furthermore, various approaches can be proposed for mitigation but there is also a need to verify these approaches for Malaysia. 

 © 2019 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Supply chain risks, Logistic side risks, Collaboration side risks, Finance side risks, Supply chain performance

 Article History: Received 21 January 2019, Received in revised form 20 May 2019, Accepted 22 June 2019

 Acknowledgement:

No Acknowledgement.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest:  The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

 Citation:

 Shahbaz MS, Kazi S, and Bhatti NUK et al. (2019). The impact of supply chain risks on supply chain performance: Empirical evidence from the manufacturing of Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 6(9): 1-12

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3

 Tables

 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 

----------------------------------------------

 References (87) 

  1. Abidin Z and Afroze N (2018). Resilience of Malaysian public sector construction industry to supply chain disruptions. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.   [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmad N and Saifudin AM (2014). Supply chain management in telecommunication industry: The mediating role of logistics integration. In the ICTOM 04– 4th International Conference on Technology and Operations Management Supply, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 648-653.   [Google Scholar]
  3. Alhosani A and Zabri SM (2018). A uniform supply chain management framework for oil and gas sector: A preliminary review. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 5(2): 19-24. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.02.004   [Google Scholar]
  4. Ali RM, Jaafar HS, and Mohamad S (2008). Logistics and supply chain in Malaysia: Issues and challenges. In the EASTS International Symposium on Sustainable Transportation Incorporating Malaysian Universities Transport Research Forum Conference, Johor, Malaysia: 12-13.   [Google Scholar]
  5. Anand N and Grover N (2015). Measuring retail supply chain performance: Theoretical model using key performance indicators (KPIs). Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(1): 135-166. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2012-0034   [Google Scholar]
  6. Arzu Akyuz G and Erman Erkan T (2010). Supply chain performance measurement: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 48(17): 5137-5155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903089536   [Google Scholar]
  7. Azmani S, Juliana N, Idrose AM, Amin NA, and Saudi ASM (2017). Challenges of communication system during emergency disaster response in Malaysia: A review. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 9(4S): 890-904. https://doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v9i4S.51   [Google Scholar]
  8. Basole RC, Bellamy MA, Park H, and Putrevu J (2016). Computational analysis and visualization of global supply network risks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 12(3): 1206-1213. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2016.2549268   [Google Scholar]
  9. Basu G, Jeyasingam J, Habib MM, Letchmana U, and Ravindran R (2017). The impact of supply chain management practices on the performance of private universities in Malaysia. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 6(3): 22-35.   [Google Scholar]
  10. Berling P and Rosling K (2005). The effects of financial risks on inventory policy. Management Science, 51(12): 1804-1815. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0435   [Google Scholar]
  11. Braud JA and Gong S (2016). Quantifying and visualizing risk in the garment manufacturing supply chain. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  12. Cavinato JL (2004). Supply chain logistics risks: from the back room to the board room. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(5): 383-387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030410545427   [Google Scholar]
  13. Chardine-Baumann E and Botta-Genoulaz V (2014). A framework for sustainable performance assessment of supply chain management practices. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 76: 138-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.07.029   [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen J (2012). The role of supply chain collaboration in supply chain risk mitigation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.   [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen J, Sohal AS, and Prajogo DI (2013). Supply chain operational risk mitigation: A collaborative approach. International Journal of Production Research, 51(7): 2186-2199. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.727490   [Google Scholar]
  16. Chopra S and Sodhi MS (2004). Supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1): 53-61.   [Google Scholar]
  17. Christopher M, Mena C, Khan O, and Yurt O (2011). Approaches to managing global sourcing risk. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(2): 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541111115338   [Google Scholar]
  18. Cook LS, Heiser DR, and Sengupta K (2011). The moderating effect of supply chain role on the relationship between supply chain practices and performance: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 41(2): 104-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031111118521   [Google Scholar]
  19. Das TK and Teng BS (1998). Resource and risk management in the strategic alliance making process. Journal of Management, 24(1): 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80052-X   [Google Scholar]
  20. Effendi FSR (2015). The determinants of logistics efficiency in Malaysia. Social Science Research Network, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Selangor, Malaysia: 1-16.   [Google Scholar]
  21. Elkins D, Handfield RB, Blackhurst J, and Craighead CW (2005). 18 ways to guard against disruption. Management, 1(1): 10-11.   [Google Scholar]
  22. Ellis SC, Shockley J, and Henry RM (2011). Making sense of supply disruption risk research: A conceptual framework grounded in enactment theory. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(2): 65-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2011.03217.x   [Google Scholar]
  23. Faisal MN (2009). Benchmarking supply chains on risk dimensions. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 5(3): 402-427. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2009.024153   [Google Scholar]
  24. Faisal NM, Banwet DK, and Shankar R (2006). Supply chain risk mitigation: Modeling the enablers. Business Process Management Journal, 12(4): 535-552. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150610678113   [Google Scholar]
  25. Faisal NM, Banwet DK, and Shankar R (2007). Information risks management in supply chains: an assessment and mitigation framework. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 20(6): 677-699. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390710830727   [Google Scholar]
  26. Feng Z, He R, Zhu W, and Amin F (2017). Supply side risks assessment of the supply chain-a case study of the supply side risks assessment in HUAWEI’ s supply chain. Student Thesis, Linnaeus University, Sweden.   [Google Scholar]
  27. Fornell C and Larcker DF (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104   [Google Scholar]
  28. Fradinata E, Suthummanon S, and Suntiamorntut W (2017). Reducing the bullwhip effect from signal demand of hybrid artificial neural network models of supply chain in Indonesia. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 4(10): 64-75. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.010.011   [Google Scholar]
  29. Gunasekaran A and Kobu B (2007). Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: A review of recent literature (1995–2004) for research and applications. International Journal of Production Research, 45(12): 2819-2840. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600806513   [Google Scholar]
  30. Gunasekaran A, Patel C, and McGaughey RE (2004). A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3): 333-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.08.003   [Google Scholar]
  31. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, and Anderson RE (2014). Multivariate data analysis. 7th Edition, Pearson Education Limited, London, UK.   [Google Scholar]
  32. Hair JFJ, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, and Sarstedt M (2016). A Primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, USA. https://doi.org/10.15358/9783800653614   [Google Scholar]
  33. Handfield R and McCormack KP (2007). Supply chain risk management: Minimizing disruptions in global sourcing. Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton, USA. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420013306   [Google Scholar]
  34. Hassan AAM, Zaharudin A, and Yunus AM (2015). Delays in physical distribution: A case study of sony supply chain solutions Malaysia. In the 4th International Seminar on Entrepreneurship and Business, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Penang, Malaysia: 658-674.   [Google Scholar]
  35. Hendricks KB and Singhal VR (2003). The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth. Journal of Operations Management, 21(5): 501-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2003.02.003   [Google Scholar]
  36. Henseler J, Ringle CM, and Sarstedt M (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1): 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8   [Google Scholar]
  37. Jüttner U, Peck H, and Christopher M (2003). Supply chain risk management: Outlining an agenda for future research. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 6(4): 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560310001627016   [Google Scholar]
  38. Kamalahmadi M and Parast MM (2016). A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research. International Journal of Production Economics, 171: 116-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.10.023   [Google Scholar]
  39. Karia N and Soliman M (2017). Factors affecting enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems adoption among higher education institutions in Egypt. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 4(5): 144-151. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.05.025   [Google Scholar]
  40. Kauppi K, Longoni A, Caniato F, and Kuula M (2016). Managing country disruption risks and improving operational performance: Risk management along integrated supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 182: 484-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.10.006   [Google Scholar]
  41. Kouvelis P, Dong L, Boyabatli O, and Li R (2011). Handbook of integrated risk management in global supply chains. Vol. 1, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, USA. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118115800   [Google Scholar]
  42. Kungwalsong K (2013). Managing disruption risks in global supply chains. Ph.D. Dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  43. Li G, Fan H, Lee PK, and Cheng TCE (2015). Joint supply chain risk management: An agency and collaboration perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 164: 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.021   [Google Scholar]
  44. Lockamy III A and McCormack K (2010). Analysing risks in supply networks to facilitate outsourcing decisions. International Journal of Production Research, 48(2): 593-611. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903175152   [Google Scholar]
  45. Maestrini V, Luzzini D, Maccarrone P, and Caniato F (2017). Supply chain performance measurement systems: A systematic review and research agenda. International Journal of Production Economics, 183: 299-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.11.005   [Google Scholar]
  46. Manikandan L, Thamaraiselvan N, and Punniyamoorthy M (2011). An instrument to assess supply chain risk: Establishing content validity. International Journal of Enterprise Network Management, 4(4): 325-343. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJENM.2011.043796   [Google Scholar]
  47. Manuj I and Mentzer JT (2008). Global supply chain risk management. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1): 133-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2008.tb00072.x   [Google Scholar]
  48. Mody A (2012). Improving the risk identification process for a global supply chain. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  49. MPC (2016). 23rd Malaysian productivity report 2015/2016. Malaysia Productivity Corporation, Selangor, Malaysia. 
  50. Musa SN (2012). Supply chain risk management: Identification, evaluation and mitigation techniques. Ph.D. Dissertation, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.   [Google Scholar]
  51. Ng T and Ghobakhloo M (2017). What derives lean manufacturing effectiveness: An interpretive structural model. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 4(8): 104-111. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.08.015   [Google Scholar]
  52. Ponomarov SY and Holcomb MC (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1): 124-143. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090910954873   [Google Scholar]
  53. Punniyamoorthy M, Thamaraiselvan N, and Manikandan L (2013). Assessment of supply chain risk: Scale development and validation. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 20(1): 79-105. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635771311299506   [Google Scholar]
  54. Ravindran AR and Warsing DP (2016). Supply chain engineering: Models and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA. https://doi.org/10.1201/b13184   [Google Scholar]
  55. Ritchie B and Brindley C (2007). An emergent framework for supply chain risk management and performance measurement. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(11): 1398-1411. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602412   [Google Scholar]
  56. Salleh Hudin N and Abdul Hamid A (2015). Supply chain risk management in automotive small and medium enterprises in Malaysia. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 773-774: 799-803. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.773-774.799   [Google Scholar]
  57. Saunders MN (2011). Research methods for business students. Pearson Education, London, UK.   [Google Scholar]
  58. SCRL (2011). Supply chain risk management: A compilation of best practices. Supply Chain Risk Leadership Council. Available online at: https://bit.ly/2JhG5HT
  59. Seo YJ, Dinwoodie J, and Roe M (2015). Measures of supply chain collaboration in container logistics. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 17(3): 292-314. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2014.26   [Google Scholar]
  60. Shahbaz MS, Bin MF, and Rehman F (2017). What is supply chain risk management? A review. Advanced Science Letters, 23(9): 9233-9238. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.10061   [Google Scholar]
  61. Shahbaz MS, Chandio AF, Oad M, Ahmed A, and Ullah R (2018c). Stakeholders’ management approaches in construction supply chain: A New perspective of stakeholder’s theory. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 9(2): 16-25. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2018.09.02.002   [Google Scholar]
  62. Shahbaz MS, Kazi AG, Othman B, Javaid M, Hussain K, and Rasi RZR (2019). Identification, assessment and mitigation of environment side risks for Malaysian manufacturing. Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research, 9(1): 3851-3857.   [Google Scholar]
  63. Shahbaz MS, Rasi RZRM, Bin Ahmad MF, and Sohu S (2018a). The impact of supply chain collaboration on operational performance: Empirical evidence from manufacturing of Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 5(8): 64-71. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.08.009   [Google Scholar]
  64. Shahbaz MS, Rasi RZRM, Zulfakar MH, Ahmad MB, Abbas Z, and Mubarak MF (2018b). A novel metric of measuring performance for supply chain risk management: Drawbacks and qualities of good performance. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 10(3S): 967-988.   [Google Scholar]
  65. Sharma SK and Bhat A (2012). Identification and assessment of supply chain risk: Development of AHP model for supply chain risk prioritisation. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 5(4): 350-369. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJASM.2012.050155   [Google Scholar]
  66. Shukla RK, Garg D, and Agarwal A (2013). Supply chain coordination competency and firm performance: An empirical study. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2(4): 64-70.   [Google Scholar]
  67. Singh G and Wahid NA (2014). Supply chain risk management: A review. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 3(3): 59-67.   [Google Scholar]
  68. Sodhi MS, Son BG, and Tang CS (2012). Researchers' perspectives on supply chain risk management. Production and Operations Management, 21(1): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3238-8   [Google Scholar]
  69. Solutions AR (2015). Global risk management survey. Aon Risk Solutions, London, UK.   [Google Scholar]
  70. Sukati I, Hamid AB, and Baharun R (2013). Testing the effect of the supply chain management implementation on business performance: An empirical study. International Business Research, 6(1): 76-89. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v6n1p76   [Google Scholar]
  71. Sukati I, Hamid AB, Baharun R, and Yusoff RM (2012). The study of supply chain management strategy and practices on supply chain performance. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40: 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.185   [Google Scholar]
  72. Sundram VPK, Chandran VGR, and Awais Bhatti M (2016). Supply chain practices and performance: The indirect effects of supply chain integration. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(6): 1445-1471. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-03-2015-0023   [Google Scholar]
  73. Tang O and Musa SN (2011). Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1): 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.06.013   [Google Scholar]
  74. Thun JH and Hoenig D (2011). An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1): 242-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.010   [Google Scholar]
  75. Trkman P and McCormack K (2009). Supply chain risk in turbulent environments—A conceptual model for managing supply chain network risk. International Journal of Production Economics, 119(2): 247-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.03.002   [Google Scholar]
  76. Tsai MC, Liao CH, and Han CS (2008). Risk perception on logistics outsourcing of retail chains: Model development and empirical verification in Taiwan. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(6): 415-424. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540810905679   [Google Scholar]
  77. Tse YK, Matthews RL, Hua Tan K, Sato Y, and Pongpanich C (2016). Unlocking supply chain disruption risk within the Thai beverage industry. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(1): 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2015-0108   [Google Scholar]
  78. Vilko J (2012). Approaches to supply chain risk management: Identification, analysis and control. Ph.D. Dissertation, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland.   [Google Scholar]
  79. Wagner SM and Bode C (2008). An empirical examination of supply chain performance along several dimensions of risk. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1): 307-325. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2008.tb00081.x   [Google Scholar]
  80. Wagner SM and Neshat N (2012). A comparison of supply chain vulnerability indices for different categories of firms. International Journal of Production Research, 50(11): 2877-2891. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.561540   [Google Scholar]
  81. Wang M, Jie F, and Abareshi A (2014). The measurement model of supply chain uncertainty and risk in the Australian courier industry. Operations and Supply Chain Management, 7(3): 89-96. https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm0180114   [Google Scholar]
  82. Waters D (2011). Supply chain risk management: vulnerability and resilience in logistics. Kogan Page Publishers, London, UK.   [Google Scholar]
  83. Wilson MC (2007). The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 43(4): 295-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2005.09.008   [Google Scholar]
  84. Yaakub S and Mustafa HK (2015). Supply chain risk management for the SME’s. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(1 S2): 151-158. https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2015.v4n1s2p151   [Google Scholar]
  85. Zeng B (2017). Modeling and investigating supply chain risks under the effect of partnerships. BiblioBazaar Charleston, South Carolina, USA.   [Google Scholar]
  86. Zsidisin GA, Petkova BN, and Dam L (2015). Examining the influence of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth: Does the reason matter? International Journal of Production Research, 54(1): 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1015751   [Google Scholar]
  87. Zubair M and Mufti NA (2015). Identification and assessment of supply chain risks associated with dairy products sector. Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 11: 167-175. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-5129.2015.11.25   [Google Scholar]