International journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN:2313-626X

Frequency: 12

line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 6, Issue 7 (July 2019), Pages: 112-116

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: Human aggressiveness and reactions towards uncertain decisions

 Author(s): Farhan Bashir 1, Noman Ashraf 2, Ayyaz Yaqoob 1, Abid Rafiq 1, Raza Ul Mustafa 3, *

 Affiliation(s):

 1Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan
 2Department of Computer Science, University of Lahore, Pakpattan Campus, Pakpattan, Pakistan
 3Department of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Sahiwal Campus, Sahiwal, Pakistan

  Full Text - PDF          XML

 * Corresponding Author. 

  Corresponding author's ORCID profile: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1436-9127

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2019.07.015

 Abstract:

Big data is a term that defines data sets are so large or complex that traditional data processing applications are inadequate. Data comes with different formats such as Multilanguage, structured, unstructured and emails. Challenges dealing with a huge amount of data includes analysis, search, sharing, transfer, and visualization. Not all the data collected contains useful information, so there's a need to refine this data in order to filter out the useful information. Tweets posted on Twitter are expressed as opinions. These opinions can be used for different purposes such as to take public views on uncertain decisions. These decisions have a direct impact on the user’s life such as violations and aggressiveness are common causes. For this purpose, we have collected opinions on some popular decision taken in the past decade from Twitter. We have divided the tweet text into two classes; Anger (negative) and positive. We have proposed a prediction model to predict public opinions towards such decisions. We used Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes (NB) and Logistic Regression (LR) classifier for a text classification task. Furthermore, we have also compared SVM results with NB, LR. The research will help us to predict early behaviors and reactions of people before the big consequences of such decisions. Moreover, the results highlight the feasibility of using social media to predict public opinions. 

 © 2019 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Twitter, Social networks, Machine learning, Text analysis, Opinion mining

 Article History: Received 1 January 2019, Received in revised form 6 May 2019, Accepted 29 May 2019

 Acknowledgement:

No Acknowledgement.

 Compliance with ethical standards

 Conflict of interest:  The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

 Citation:

 Bashir F, Ashraf N, and Yaqoob A et al. (2019). Human aggressiveness and reactions towards uncertain decisions. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 6(7): 112-116

 Permanent Link to this page

 Figures

 No Figure

 Tables

 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6

----------------------------------------------

 References (23) 

  1. Adedoyin-Olowe M, Gaber MM, and Stahl F (2013). A survey of data mining techniques for social media analysis. Available online at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.4617   [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbosa L and Feng J (2010). Robust sentiment detection on twitter from biased and noisy data. In the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, Association for Computational Linguistics, Beijing, China: 36-44.   [Google Scholar]
  3. Barnaghi P, Ghaffari P, and Breslin JG (2016). Opinion mining and sentiment polarity on twitter and correlation between events and sentiment. In the IEEE Second International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications, IEEE, Oxford, UK: 52-57. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigDataService.2016.36   [Google Scholar]
  4. Bravo-Marquez F, Mendoza M, and Poblete B (2013). Combining strengths, emotions and polarities for boosting Twitter sentiment analysis. In the Second International Workshop on Issues of Sentiment Discovery and Opinion Mining, ACM, Chicago, Illinois: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1145/2502069.2502071   [Google Scholar]
  5. Chodey KP and Hu G (2016). Clinical text analysis using machine learning methods. In the 15th International Conference on Computer and Information Science, IEEE, Okayama, Japan: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIS.2016.7550908   [Google Scholar]
  6. Choi Y, Jung Y, and Myaeng SH (2010). Identifying controversial issues and their sub-topics in news articles. In: Zeng D, Wei D, Chau M, and Wang F (Eds.), Pacific-Asia workshop on intelligence and security informatics: 140-153. Springer, Berlin, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13601-6_16   [Google Scholar]
  7. Fernandes R and D'Souza R (2016). Analysis of product Twitter data though opinion mining. In the IEEE Annual India Conference, IEEE, Bangalore, India: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/INDICON.2016.7839025   [Google Scholar]
  8. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, and Witten IH (2009). The WEKA data mining software: An update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 11(1): 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1145/1656274.1656278   [Google Scholar]
  9. Jiang L, Yu M, Zhou M, Liu X, and Zhao T (2011). Target-dependent twitter sentiment classification. In the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, Oregon, USA, 1: 151-160.   [Google Scholar]
  10. Kashyap N, Choudhury T, Chaudhary DK, and Lal R (2016). Mood based classification of music by analyzing lyrical data using text mining. In the International Conference on Micro-Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, IEEE, Ghaziabad, India: 287-292. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMETE.2016.65   [Google Scholar]
  11. Khan A, Baharudin B, and Khan K (2011). Sentiment classification from online customer reviews using lexical contextual sentence structure. In the International Conference on Software Engineering and Computer Systems, Springer, Pahang, Malaysia, 317-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22170-5_28   [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee H, Han Y, Kim K, and Kim K (2014). Sentiment analysis on online social network using probability model. In the 6th International Conference on Advances in Future Internet, Lisbon, Portugal: 14-19.   [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu B and Zhang L (2012). A survey of opinion mining and sentiment analysis. In: Aggarwal CC and Zhai C (Eds.), Mining text data: 415-463. Springer, Boston, USA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3223-4_13   [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu KL, Li WJ, and Guo M (2012). Emoticon smoothed language models for twitter sentiment analysis. In the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, Canada: 1678-1684.   [Google Scholar]
  15. Mustafa RU, Nawaz MS, Farzund J, Lali MI, Shahzad B, and Viger PF (2017a). Early detection of controversial urdu speeches from social media. Data Science and Pattern Recognition, 1(2): 26-42.   [Google Scholar]
  16. Mustafa RU, Nawaz MS, Lali MIU, Zia T, and Mehmood W (2017b). Predicting the cricket match outcome using crowd opinions on social networks: A comparative study of machine learning methods. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, 30(1): 63-76. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjcs.vol30no1.5   [Google Scholar]
  17. Nawaz MS, Bilal M, Lali MI, Ul Mustafa R, Aslam W, and Jajja S (2017). Effectiveness of social media data in healthcare communication. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, 7(6): 1365-1371. https://doi.org/10.1166/jmihi.2017.2148   [Google Scholar]
  18. Rathore AK and Ilavarasan PV (2017). Social media analytics for new product development: Case of a pizza. In the International Conference on Advances in Mechanical, Industrial, Automation and Management Systems, IEEE, Allahabad, India: 213-219. https://doi.org/10.1109/AMIAMS.2017.8069214   [Google Scholar]
  19. Saini S and Kohli S (2016). Machine learning techniques for effective text analysis of social network e-health data. In the 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development, IEEE, New Delhi, India: 3783-3788.   [Google Scholar]
  20. Salton G and Buckley C (1988). Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 24(5): 513-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(88)90021-0   [Google Scholar]
  21. Sebastiani F (2002). Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys, 34(1): 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1145/505282.505283   [Google Scholar]
  22. Torunoğlu D, Telseren G, Sağtürk Ö, and Ganiz MC (2013). Wikipedia based semantic smoothing for twitter sentiment classification. In the 2013 IEEE INISTA, IEEE, Albena, Bulgaria: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/INISTA.2013.6577649   [Google Scholar]
  23. Žunić E, Djedović A, and Đonko D (2016). Application of big data and text mining methods and technologies in modern business analyzing social networks data about traffic tracking. In the XI International Symposium on Telecommunications, IEEE, Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIHTEL.2016.7775717   [Google Scholar]