International journal of

ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES

EISSN: 2313-3724, Print ISSN:2313-626X

Frequency: 12
line decor
  
line decor

 Volume 5, Issue 5 (May 2018), Pages: 20-33

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: Organizational external factors, culture, and innovativeness of shipbuilding companies: Moderating role of resources

 Author(s): Ahmed Mohammed Kamaruddeen *, Chieng Tiong Koh, Wahida Wahi, Angela Ting Mee Yii

 Affiliation(s):

 Quantity Surveying Programme, School of Built Environment, University College of Technology Sarawak, Sarawak, Malaysia

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.05.003

 Full Text - PDF          XML

 Abstract:

In examining the influence of organizational culture and external factors on the innovativeness moderated by company resources among the shipbuilding companies operating in Sarawak Malaysia, we draw upon a theoretical perspective to develop hypotheses proposing that the organizational culture and external factors do influence the innovativeness among the shipbuilding companies in Sarawak. We used the simple random sampling to collect data from shipbuilding companies in Sarawak. We received 41 valid questionnaires out of 65 questionnaires distributed, yielding 63% response rate. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to test the direct and moderating effect on the variables. The result shows an unexpected negative relationship between organizational culture and innovativeness. However, external factors have a significant relationship with innovativeness among the shipbuilding companies. In addition, company resources moderate the relationships between culture and innovativeness. The findings from this study suggest that to enhance the innovativeness among the shipbuilding companies operating in Sarawak, managers and chief executives need to seriously consider all dimensions of culture, external factors and company resources examined in this research. It is hoped that our findings complement the existing body of knowledge and contribute to future studies on organizational innovativeness. 

 © 2018 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Organizational culture, External factors, Resources innovativeness, Shipbuilding companies, Sarawak

 Article History: Received 20 October 2017, Received in revised form 15 February 2018, Accepted 25 February 2018

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.05.003

 Citation:

 Kamaruddeen AM, Koh CT, Wahi W, and Yii ATM (2018). Organizational external factors, culture, and innovativeness of shipbuilding companies: Moderating role of resources. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 5(5): 20-33

 Permanent Link:

 http://www.science-gate.com/IJAAS/2018/V5I5/Kamaruddeen.html

----------------------------------------------

 References (83)

  1. Ackermann MS, Stephan M, and Penrose JM (2015). Assessing organizational innovativeness–evidence from corporate narratives. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(4): 399-414. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2014-0026   [Google Scholar] 
  2. Akgun AE, Keskin H, Byrne JC, and Aren S (2007). Emotional and learning capability and their impact on product innovativeness and firm performance. Technovation, 27(9): 501-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.03.001   [Google Scholar] 
  3. Akintoye A (2000). Analysis of factors influencing project cost estimating practice. Construction Management and Economics, 18(1): 77‐89. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900370979   [Google Scholar]  
  4. Alas R, Niglas K, and Kraus A (2009). Manufacturing strategies and choices in cultural contexts. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(4): 279-289. https://doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2009.10.279-289   [Google Scholar]  
  5. Altayyar A and Beaumont-Kerridge J (2016). External factors affecting the adoption of E-procurement in Saudi Arabian's SMEs. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 229: 363 - 375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.147   [Google Scholar] 
  6. Bagozzi R and Yi Y (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1): 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327   [Google Scholar]  
  7. Baron RM and Kenny DA (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173   [Google Scholar] PMid:3806354 
  8. Byrne B (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. 2nd Edition, Taylor and Francis Group, New York, USA.   [Google Scholar]     
  9. Cameron KS and Quinn RE (2005). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, USA.   [Google Scholar]      
  10. Camisón C and Monfort-Mir VM (2012). Measuring innovation in tourism from the Schumpeterian and the dynamic-capabilities perspectives. Tourism Management, 33(4): 776-789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.08.012   [Google Scholar]  
  11. Chang DR and Cho H (2008). Organizational memory influences new product success. Journal of Business Research, 61(1): 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.05.005   [Google Scholar]  
  12. Cherian J and Deshpande R (1985). The impact of organizational culture on the adoption of industrial innovations. AMA Educators' Proceedings, Series, 51: 30-34.   [Google Scholar] 
  13. Chin WW (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2): 295-336.   [Google Scholar]    
  14. Cohen J (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd Edition, Routledge, Abingdon, UK.   [Google Scholar]      
  15. Cohen WM and Levinthal DA (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553   [Google Scholar] 
  16. Damanpour F (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3): 555-590. https://doi.org/10.2307/256406   [Google Scholar] 
  17. Damanpour F and Evan WM (1992). The Adoption of Innovations over Time: Structural determinants and consequences in library organizations. Library and Information Science Research, 14(4): 465-482.   [Google Scholar]     
  18. Dasgupta P and Stiglitz J (1980). Industrial structure and the nature of innovative activity. The Economic Journal, 90(358): 266-293. https://doi.org/10.2307/2231788   [Google Scholar]  
  19. Demirbas D, Hussain JG, and Matlay H (2011). Owner‐managers' perceptions of barriers to innovation: empirical evidence from Turkish SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18(4): 764-780. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001111179794   [Google Scholar]  
  20. Dennett A, Cameron D, Bamford C, and Jenkins A (2014). An investigation into hospitality cruise ship work through the exploration of metaphors. Employee Relations, 36(5): 480-495. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-08-2013-0111   [Google Scholar]  
  21. Duarte PAO and Raposo MLB (2010). A PLS model to study brand preference: An application to the mobile phone market. In: Vinzi V, Chin WW, Henseler J, and Wang H (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: 449-485. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.   [Google Scholar]      
  22. Dulaimi MF, Ling FY, and Bajracharya A (2003). Organizational motivation and inter-organizational interaction in construction innovation in Singapore. Construction Management and Economics, 21(3): 307-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000056144   [Google Scholar] 
  23. Duygulu E and Özeren E (2009). The effects of leadership styles and organizational culture on firm's innovativeness. African Journal of Business Management, 3(9): 475-485.   [Google Scholar]   
  24. Elliott AC and Woodward WA (2007). Statistical analysis quick reference guidebook: With SPSS examples. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, USA. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985949   [Google Scholar]  
  25. Ergeneli A, Gohar R, and Temirbekova Z (2007). Transformational leadership: Its relationship to culture value dimensions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31(6): 703-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.07.003   [Google Scholar]  
  26. Falk RF and Miller NB (1992). A primer for soft modeling. The University of Akron Press, Ohio, USA.   [Google Scholar]      
  27. Garcıa-Morales VJ, Llorens-Montes FJ, and Verdu´-Jover AJ (2006). Antecedents and consequences of organizational innovation and organizational learning in entrepreneurship. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 106(1): 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570610642940   [Google Scholar]  
  28. Goodhue D, Lewis W, and Thompson R (2007). Research note-statistical power in analysing interaction effects: Questioning the advantage of PLS with product indicators. Information Systems Research, 18(2): 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0123   [Google Scholar]  
  29. Gotz O, Liehr-Gobbers K, and Krafft M (2010). Evaluation of structural equation models using the partial least squares (PLS) approach. In: Vinzi V, Chin WW, Henseler J, and Wang H (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: 691-711. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.   [Google Scholar]      
  30. Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, and Sarstedt M (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.   [Google Scholar]          
  31. Hair JF, Ringle CM, and Sarstedt M (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2): 139-152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202   [Google Scholar]  
  32. Hair JF, Ringle CM, and Sarstedt M (2013). Editorial-partial least squares structural equation modelling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001   [Google Scholar]  
  33. Hall CM (2009). Innovation and tourism policy in Australia and New Zealand: Never the twain shall meet?. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 1(1): 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407960802703466   [Google Scholar]  
  34. Hall MC and Williams A (2008). Tourism and innovation. Routledge, New York, USA.   [Google Scholar]      
  35. Henseler J, Ringle CM, and Sinkovics RR (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In: Sinkovics RR and Ghauri PN (Eds.), New challenges to international marketing: 277-319. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK.   [Google Scholar] PMCid:PMC2692577       
  36. Hjalager AM (2010). A review of innovation research in tourism. Tourism Management, 31(1): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.08.012   [Google Scholar]  
  37. Hurley RF and Hult GTM (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. The Journal of Marketing, 62(3): 42-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251742   [Google Scholar]  
  38. Jain K, Siddiquee Q, and Singal V (2010). Measurement of innovativeness in an organisation using AHP. In the Technology Management for Global Economic Growth, IEEE, Phuket, Thailand: 1-11.   [Google Scholar]      
  39. Jantan M, Nasurdin AM, and Fadzil NFA (2003). Designing innovative organizations in Malaysia: Do structure and culture matter?. Global Business Review, 4(2): 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/097215090300400201   [Google Scholar]  
  40. Jaworski BJ and Kholi AK (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3): 53-70. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251854   [Google Scholar]  
  41. Jiménez-Jiménez D and Sanz-Valle R (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4): 408-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010   [Google Scholar]  
  42. Jung DI, Chow C, and Wu A (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4): 525-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00050-X   [Google Scholar]  
  43. Kamaruddeen AM, Yusof N, and Said I (2012). Dimensions of firm innovativeness in housing industry. Emerging Issues in the Natural and Applied Sciences, 2(1): 118-133. https://doi.org/10.7813/einas.2012/2-1/7   [Google Scholar]  
  44. Kamaruddeen AM, Yusof N, and Said I (2015). Relevance of firm size on the relationship between organizational culture and innovativeness. Jurnal Teknologi, 77(5): 15-22. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6108   [Google Scholar]  
  45. Kanter RM (2000). When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Entrepreneurship: The Social Science View, 10: 167-210.   [Google Scholar]      
  46. Kaya N and Torlak NG (2013). The impacts of the elements of individual achievement motive on organisational innovativeness: A study of the turkish public sector. Journal of Academic Studies, 15(59): 97-122.   [Google Scholar]      
  47. Kimberly JR and Evanisko MJ (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4): 689-713. https://doi.org/10.2307/256170   [Google Scholar]    PMid:10253688     
  48. Knowles C, Hansen E, and Dibrell C (2008). Measuring firm innovativeness: Development and refinement of a new scale. Journal of Forest Products Business Research, 5(5): 1-24.   [Google Scholar]          
  49. Kocher PY, Kaudela-Baum S, and Wolf P (2011). Enhancing organisational innovation capability through systemic action research: A case of a Swiss SME in the food industry. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24(1): 17-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9174-4   [Google Scholar]  
  50. Kock A, Gemünden HG, Salomo S, and Schultz C (2011). The mixed blessings of technological innovativeness for the commercial success of new products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(1): 28-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00859.x   [Google Scholar]  
  51. Kometa ST and Olomolaiye PO (1997). Evaluation of factors influencing construction clients' decision to build. Journal of Management in Engineering, 13(2): 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1997)13:2(77)   [Google Scholar] 
  52. Krejcie RV and Morgan DW (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3): 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308   [Google Scholar]  
  53. Laforet S (2016). Effects of organisational culture on organisational innovation performance in family firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 23(2): 379 – 407. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-02-2015-0020   [Google Scholar]  
  54. Lin CY (2007). Factors affecting innovation in logistics technologies for logistics services providers in China. Journal of Technology Management in China, 1(2): 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1108/17468770710723604   [Google Scholar]  
  55. Madrid-Guijarro A, Garcia D, and Van Auken H (2009). Barriers to innovation among Spanish manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4): 465-488.   [Google Scholar]      
  56. Marsh EA (2012). The effects of cruise ship tourism in coastal heritage cities: A case study of Charleston, South Carolina. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 2(2): 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1108/20441261211273662   [Google Scholar]  
  57. McCrae RR, Kurtz JE, Yamagata S, and Terracciano A (2011). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(1): 28-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310366253   [Google Scholar]  PMid:20435807 PMCid:PMC2927808         
  58. Mostafa M (2005). Factors affecting organisational creativity and innovativeness in Egyptian business organisations: an empirical investigation. Journal of Management Development, 24(1): 7-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710510572326   [Google Scholar] 
  59. Naidoo V (2010). Firm survival through a crisis: The influence of market orientation, marketing innovation and business strategy. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(8): 1311-1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.02.005   [Google Scholar]  
  60. Narver JC and Slater SF (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. The Journal of Marketing, 54(4): 20-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251757   [Google Scholar] 
  61. Nonaka I (2002). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Choo CW and Bontis N (Eds.), The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge: 437-462. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.   [Google Scholar]       
  62. Obendhain AM and Johnson WC (2004). Product and process innovation in service organizations: The influence of organizational culture in higher education institutions. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 9(3): 91-113.   [Google Scholar]       
  63. Peters R and Naicker V (2013). Small medium micro enterprise business goals and government support: A South African case study. South African Journal of Business Management, 44(4): 13-24.   [Google Scholar]        
  64. Podsakoff PM and Organ DW (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of management, 12(4): 531-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408   [Google Scholar]  
  65. Prasad B and Junni P (2017). Understanding top management team conflict, environmental uncertainty and firm innovativeness: Empirical evidence from India. International Journal of Conflict Management, 28(1): 122-143. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-02-2016-0006   [Google Scholar]  
  66. Premkumar G and Roberts M (1999). Adoption of new information technology in rural small businesses. Omega International of Management Science, 27: 467-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00071-1   [Google Scholar]  
  67. Raj R and Srivastava KB (2016). Mediating role of organizational learning on the relationship between market orientation and innovativeness. The Learning Organization, 23(5): 370-384. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-09-2013-0051   [Google Scholar] 
  68. Russell DM and Hoag AM (2004). People and information technology in the supply chain: Social and organizational influences on adoption. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(2): 102-122. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030410526914   [Google Scholar]  
  69. Salavou H and Lioukas S (2003). Radical product innovations in SMEs: The dominance of entrepreneurial orientation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 12(2): 94-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.00272   [Google Scholar]  
  70. Sekaran U and Bougie R (2016). Research method for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, USA.   [Google Scholar]     
  71. Shih CC and Huang SJ (2010). Exploring the relationship between organizational culture and software process improvement deployment. Information and Management, 47(5): 271-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.06.001   [Google Scholar]  
  72. Slater SF and Narver JC (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. The Journal of Marketing, 59(3): 63-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252120   [Google Scholar]  
  73. Slivko O and Theilen B (2014). Innovation or imitation? The effect of spillovers and competitive pressure on firms' R&D strategy choice. Journal of Economics, 112(3): 253-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-013-0361-5   [Google Scholar]  
  74. Subramanian A and Nilakanta S (1996). Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Omega, 24(6): 631-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(96)00031-X   [Google Scholar]  
  75. Sun W, Chou CP, Stacy A, Ma H, Unger J, and Gallaher P (2007). SAS and SPSS macros to calculate standardized Cronbach's alpha using the upper bound of the phi coefficient for dichotomous items. Behavior Research Methods, 39(1): 71-81. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192845   [Google Scholar] PMid:17552473  
  76. Sutcliffe KM and Zaheer A (1998). Uncertainty in the transaction environment: An empirical test. Strategic Management Journal, 19(1): 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199801)19:1<1::AID-SMJ938>3.0.CO;2-5   [Google Scholar]  
  77. Szymanski DM and Henard DH (2001). Customer satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(1): 16-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070301291002   [Google Scholar]  
  78. Tajeddini K (2010). Effect of customer orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on innovativeness: Evidence from the hotel industry in Switzerland. Tourism Management, 31(2): 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.013   [Google Scholar] 
  79. Thong JY (1999). An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4): 187-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1999.11518227   [Google Scholar] 
  80. Tsekouras G, Poulis E, and Poulis K (2011). Innovation and dynamic capabilities in a traditional service sector: evidence from shipping companies. Baltic Journal of Management, 6(3): 320-341. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465261111167975   [Google Scholar]  
  81. Tushman ML and Nadler DA (1978). Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 3(3): 613-624.   [Google Scholar]    
  82. Wang CL and Ahmed PK (2004). The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4): 303-313. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410565056   [Google Scholar]  
  83. Zhang X, Platten A, and Shen L (2011). Green property development practice in China: costs and barriers. Building and Environment, 46(11): 2153-2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.04.031   [Google Scholar]