Volume 5, Issue 3 (March 2018), Pages: 46-52

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: Advanced application for direct assessment of course and program learning outcomes in engineering higher education

 Author(s): Mona A. Omar ^1, *, Mostafa A. Ismail ^{1, 2}

 Affiliation(s):

 ¹College of Engineering, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
 ²Faculty of Engineering, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.03.007

 Full Text - PDF          XML

 Abstract:

Problem solving curricula form an essential part of the higher engineering education, which is in line with the nature of the profession, skills and attitudes of engineers. This fact renders direct assessment of learning outcomes in the engineering education an indispensable process, although not completely sufficient by itself. Consistent with the problem solving nature of the discipline, direct assessment of learning outcomes in this instance ought to be quantificational, as this paper in fact aims to contribute considerably to the overall process of assessing learning outcomes, compared with indirect assessment tools. The research method of this paper offers a set of three EXCEL-VBA applications that have been precisely designed to assess learning outcomes at course and program levels for engineering university students. The paper also describes the comprehensive algorithm of the applications and formulas used, so that other educational institutes and academics can readily reproduce. The results of the research applications provide a platform of input and output that is easy and quick to use, flexible, versatile and comprehensive in nature. Numerous assessments in the form of assignments, quizzes, major exams, projects, presentations, portfolios and final exams can be accommodated, with flexibility in the critical input parameters, such as criterion of achievement and weight of each assessment instrument. As soon as learning outcomes of all courses can be assessed, the output can readily be fed into a second application to determine the performance of students at a program or departmental level. As a conclusion, applications can be implemented by instructors to determine the performance of their students, both numerically and graphically, against established learning outcomes. 

 © 2018 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: Assessment, Course and program outcomes, Academic accreditation, Engineering education, EXCEL

 Article History: Received 31 August 2017, Received in revised form 28 December 2017, Accepted 6 January 2018

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.03.007

 Citation:

 Omar MA and Ismail MA (2018). Advanced application for direct assessment of course and program learning outcomes in engineering higher education. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 5(3): 46-52

 Permanent Link:

 http://www.science-gate.com/IJAAS/2018/V5I3/Omar.html

----------------------------------------------

 References (9)

1. ABET (2015). Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. Available online at: http://www.abet.org 
2. Blandford DK and Hwang DJ (2003). Five easy but effective assessment methods. In the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, ACM, Reno, Navada, USA, 35(1): 41-44. https://doi.org/10.1145/611892.611928 
3. DeLyser RR and Hamstad MA (2000). Outcomes based assessment and a successful ABET 2000 accreditation at the University of Denver. In the 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, IEEE, Kansas City, MO, USA, 1: T1A-1. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.897508 
4. Essa E, Dittrich A, Dascalu S, and Harris Jr FC (2010). ACAT: a web-based software tool to facilitate course assessment for ABET Accreditation. In the 7th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, IEEE, Las Vegas, NV, USA: 88-93. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITNG.2010.224 
5. Felder RM and Brent R (2003). Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1): 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00734.x 
6. Mohammad AW and Zaharim A (2012). Programme outcomes assessment models in engineering faculties. Asian Social Science, 8(16): 115-121. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n16p115 
7. NCAAA (2015). National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment. Available online at: www.ncaaa.org.sa     
8. Sriraman V and Stapleton W (2013). Lessons learned in first time accreditation of engineering programmes. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 15(2): 103-110.     
9. Yamayee ZA, Albright RJ, Inan MI, Kennedy MS, Khan KH, and Murty VD (2005). Work in progress-streamlining assessment process in response to a successful ABET visit. In the 35th Annual Conference on Frontiers in Education, IEEE, Indianopolis, IN, USA: S1C-S1C. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2005.1612167