Volume 5, Issue 2 (February 2018), Pages: 97-102

----------------------------------------------

 Original Research Paper

 Title: The effectiveness of MOODLE as a LAN-based instructional teaching-learning material

 Author(s): Fredelino A. Galleto Jr. *, Angela Rose J. Barrato, Janette M. Bermudez, Harlene Mae D. Buenavista, Richard N. Coronel, Lory Jean Cabuday, Glenda J. Jeruela, John Rey D. Legurpa, Roche T. Magsayo, Sheila T. Mejos

 Affiliation(s):

 Southern Christian College, Poblacion 5, Midsayap, North Cotabato, 9410 Philippines

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.02.016

 Full Text - PDF          XML

 Abstract:

This study aimed to probe on how Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment (MOODLE), as an e-learning tool, improved the academic performance of the students who are enrolled in Electronic Spreadsheet with ICT (CS22) subject and how it affected the teaching performance of faculty by using it as a platform for teaching-learning material. The researchers assumed that there is a significant difference between traditional and blended MOODLE implementation as an instructional teaching-learning material. The researchers followed interpretive research design that combined elements of participatory action research, experimental design, and data mining. The student’s midterm and final grade were used as the baseline factor to gauge the effectiveness of blended MOODLE implementation. The researchers, therefore, conclude that MOODLE is beneficial to the teachers as instructional material. However, students are not receptive to using MOODLE based on the results gathered. Lastly, identify new data patterns generated during the data mining procedures in assessing the effectiveness of the students’ academic performance. 

 © 2017 The Authors. Published by IASE.

 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 Keywords: MOODLE, COLLES, Participatory action research, Combined preferred and actual form, Data mining

 Article History: Received 4 August 2017, Received in revised form 9 December 2017, Accepted 20 December 2017

 Digital Object Identifier: 

 https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.02.016

 Citation:

 Galleto Jr. FA, Barrato ARJ, Bermudez JM et al. (2018). The effectiveness of MOODLE as a LAN-based instructional teaching-learning material. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 5(2): 97-102

 Permanent Link:

 http://www.science-gate.com/IJAAS/2018/V5I2/Galleto.html

----------------------------------------------

 References (8)

1. Bishop CM (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA. 
2. Ebardo A and Valderama R (2009). The effect of the web based learning management system on knowledge acquisition of information technology students at Jose Rizal University. In The 6th International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society, Thailand: 9.1-9.5.     
3. Guba E and Lincoln Y (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA. PMCid:PMC304045     
4. Romero C, Ventura S, and García E (2008). Data mining in course management systems: Moodle case study and tutorial. Computers and Education, 51(1): 368-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.016 
5. Sadeh N, Laliberty T, Bryant R, and Smith S (1995). Development of an integrated process planning/production scheduling shell for agile manufacturing (Technical report). The Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA310806 
6. Taylor P and Maor D (2000). Assessing the efficacy of on-line teaching with the contructivist on-line learning environment survey. In the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, Curtin University of Technology, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia.     
7. Yates N and Delgado R (2008). A study concerning the use of moodle at Kanda University of International Studies. The journal of Kanda University of International Studies, 20: 405-426.     
8. York T, Gibson C, and Rankin S (2015). Defining and measuring academic success. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 20(5): 1-20.