Affiliations:
1Faculty of Psychology and Education, Hong Duc University, Thanh Hoa Province, Vietnam
2Faculty of Management, University of Transport Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam
This study investigates students’ awareness and engagement levels, evaluates the effectiveness of organizational structures, and identifies key factors influencing the success of extracurricular programs. A survey of 415 participants, including 50 management staff, 35 Youth Union and Student Association officials, and 330 students from various faculties, was conducted using structured questionnaires on student participation, institutional support, and management performance. Statistical analyses, including percentage distributions, mean scores, and ranking assessments, were used to interpret the data. Results indicate that public service and volunteer activities (X̅ = 2.61) and physical education (X̅ = 2.60) show the highest participation rates, while political and ideological education (X̅ = 2.53) ranks lowest. Leadership support (X̅ = 2.93) and organizational capacity (X̅ = 2.92) are identified as the most critical factors for success, though challenges remain in interdepartmental coordination and resource allocation. The study concludes that while extracurricular activities significantly benefit students’ holistic development, their impact depends on effective management and institutional support. Universities should prioritize interdepartmental collaboration, increase resource investment, and tailor programs to student interests. Future research should address motivational barriers and institutional constraints to further enhance participation.
Extracurricular activities, Student engagement, Institutional support, Organizational management, Higher education
https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2025.08.013
Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, L. T. H., Trinh, C. V., & Duong, T. T. (2025). The role of extracurricular activities in university education: Student engagement and institutional management. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 12(8), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2025.08.013